Skip to content

What Is a Cq (Ct) Value?

Real-time PCR (often called qPCR) is usually conducted to quantify the absolute amount of a target sequence or to compare relative amounts of a target sequence between samples. This technique monitors amplification of the target in real-time via a target-specific fluorescent signal emitted during amplification. Despite the fact that real-time PCR fluorescent dyes and probes should be sequence-specific, a considerable amount of background fluorescence occurs during most real-time PCR experiments. It is critical to bypass or account for this background signal in order to glean meaningful information about your target. This issue is addressed by two values in real-time PCR: the threshold line and the Cq value.

  1. The threshold line is the level of detection or the point at which a reaction reaches a fluorescent intensity above background levels. Before conducting PCR, you (or the software in your cycler) set a threshold level. This is literally a line in your graph that represents a level above background fluorescence, that also intersects your reaction curve somewhere in the beginning of its exponential phase (Figure 1).
  2. The Cq value or cycle quantification value is the PCR cycle number at which your sample’s reaction curve intersects the threshold line. This value tells how many cycles it took to detect a real signal from your samples. Real-Time PCR runs will have a reaction curve for each sample, and therefore many Cq values. Your cycler’s software calculates and charts the Cq value for each of your samples.


Figure 1. Threshold level and Cq value on a real-time PCR amplification curve.

Cvalues are inverse to the amount of target nucleic acid that is in your sample, and correlate to the number of target copies in your sample. Lower Cq values (typically below 29 cycles) indicate high amounts of target sequence. Higher Cq values (above 38 cycles) mean lower amounts of your target nucleic acid. High Cq values can also indicate problems with the target or the PCR set-up, as outlined later in the pitfalls section of this article.

Your PCR instrument will collect fluorescence data during each cycle. After about 15 cycles, you’ll have a good idea of your background fluorescence level – this will appear as a straight line starting from the zero cycle point. The threshold level will be just above this, but at the point where your samples start moving into exponential phase of PCR amplification. Today, computer software calculates this exact point and all modern real-time cyclers have an automatic threshold line setting.

Real-Time PCR records the amount of fluorescence emitted during the reaction where all PCR components are abundant. In this way, Cq values are usually consistent across replicates in real-time PCR. By the time the PCR reaction endpoint is reached, accumulated inhibitors, inactivated polymerases and limiting reagents create a lot of variation in endpoint values, and this is why conventional PCR cannot be used quantitatively.

Common Pitfalls

Many factors can affect your Cq values. Some differences in Cq values between your samples will be due to biological events e.g. up/down-regulation of your target gene in response to a treatment. However, Cq values are just as easily influenced by the preparation of the PCR reaction and the PCR components themselves. The most common pitfall areas are:

1. Master Mixes

Fluorescence emission can be affected by pH and salt concentration in a solution. Any change in fluorescence emission will naturally change your Cq values. Therefore, make sure you only use high quality PCR components and if using homemade solutions, check the pH and monitor salt precipitation before each experiment.

2. Passive Reference Dyes

Reaction values are the ratio of the fluorescence of your FAM (reporter) dye to your ROX (passive reference) dye. Lower amounts of ROX produce higher reaction values, assuming FAM fluorescence doesn’t change.

3. Reaction Efficiency

PCR reaction efficiency is dependent on the master mix performance, the specificity of the primers, the primer annealing temperature and the sample quality. In generally, PCR efficiency above 90 % is acceptable. PCR efficiency of 100 % indicates that the target sequence of interest doubles during each cycle. Perfect PCR efficiency coincides with a change of 3.3 cycles between 10-fold dilutions of your template.

To determine PCR efficiency for each primer pair, run serial dilutions of your template with 5 10-fold dilution steps, and calculate the R2, a statistical measure that describes how well one value can predict another. For PCR efficiency close to 100 %, your R2 value should be greater than 0.99. Run at least three replicates for each point on your standard curves. A higher replicate number is especially important for low copy number input, where variations across replicates are more likely.

Assuming you have rule out the 3 factors mentioned above, the most common causes of late Cvalues are:

  • Too little template – try using more template.
  • Suboptimal nucleic acid isolation – consider your nucleic acid isolation protocol, quantify your DNA, run an agarose gel, try another protocol/kit.
  • Poor reverse transcriptase activity during cDNA synthesis – reverse transcriptase is sensitive to degradation. Order a new one.
  • RNA/cDNA degradation – keep your workspace clean, improve your RNA handling behavior, avoid multiple freeze-thaw cycles of cDNA.
  • PCR inhibition – You can read all about PCR inhibition here.

Additional causes include infection or contamination in your cell line/culture, but these issues are usually spotted ahead of nucleic acid isolation.

Calling Delta Delta Cq

To be certain that the variations in Cq values are due to real biological changes and not technical issues, you will need to normalize your results. The most popular normalization method is known as “Delta-DeltaCt”or the Livak method. Here, you compare Cvalues of your sample to the Cq values of several reference (housekeeping) genes.

It is imperative to choose reference genes whose expression levels are not expected to change during your experiment. Common housekeeping genes include actin, alpha-tubulin, GAPDH and ubiquitin. It is wise to use at least two reference genes, and bear in mind that what may be a reference gene for one study may not be suitable for another.

The Delta-Delta Cq method makes a key assumption—that the amplification (PCR) efficiencies of your reference and target samples are almost 100 % and within 5 % of each other. Other normalization methods include the Dealt-Cq Method and the Pfaffl Method. You can read more about the qPCR data analysis methods here.

Further Reading

  1. McBryan’s Musings: qPCR normalization
  2. Real-time PCR Ct values (University of Wisconsin)
  3. 8 Essential Papers and Reference Guides for Quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Bitesize Bio, 2014).

Originally published in July 2016. Updated and republished in May 2017.

Image Credit: Madprime


  1. Sohaib waheed hussaini on January 16, 2020 at 7:46 pm

    Very informative jazakallah thnx yarr I gain much more information about real time interpreting of data. THANX

  2. RJ on September 24, 2018 at 7:06 am

    Hi! I’m doing qRT-PCR to measure miRNA expression in cell lines, and wanted to know if I could use the delta-Ct normalization method? Does anyone have any advice on this? Thank you!

  3. J. Greer on June 4, 2017 at 2:00 am

    Is there a minimum Ct value you should aim to attain? For example, is getting a Ct values between 10-15 too low to be accurately used?

  4. Mil Ka on August 11, 2016 at 5:53 am

    How could I calculate the DNA amoung in ng or DNA concentration from the Ct value.

    • Mahmoud on July 5, 2018 at 2:19 pm

      You can do that by running a standard curve. For that, you use several DNA standard (DNA with known concentration) and run them on qPCR. You finally will have ct value for each concentration and then you could draw a standard curve (DNA concentration vs Ct values). Run you unknown sample and then plot the Ct value to the standard curve and find the matched concentration of DNA in your sample(s).

  5. Bitesize Bio on October 15, 2015 at 12:01 pm

    […] each cycle, the effect of slight differences in reagents can often have a cumulative effect on your Ct value. So, what strategies can be employed to reduce the technical […]

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll To Top
Share via
Copy link