Skip to content

Get Your Clone 90% Of The Time with Ligation Independent Cloning

Are you stuck in cloning hell?, Tired of doing ligations that don’t work? Want a faster, more efficient cloning procedure? You should try ligation independent cloning.

A growing number of researchers swear by ligation independent cloning methods because they are simpler and more efficient than conventional cloning and as a recent convert to their ranks, I’d like to spread the gospel.

There are in fact a number of ligation independent cloning methods, each of which (as the name suggests) removes the need for ligation, the Achilles heel of standard cloning procedures. In this article I will describe only the ligation independent cloning method that I currently use, T4P-mediated ligation independent cloning or T4p-LIC for short. I’ll deal with the other methods in a later article (article on other methods, article on LIC primer design, LIC protocol).

The principle behind T4P-LIC is simple – instead of using restriction enzymes to generate short sticky ends as in conventional cloning, T4P-LIC uses T4 DNA polymerase to generate long sticky ends of 12-15 nucleotides.

The “stickiness” of restriction enzyme-generated ends is fairly weak the small number of hydrogen bonds between those few exposed nucleotides are not enough to hold the plasmid and insert together permanently, so the covalent joining of the phosphodiester backbone by DNA ligase is needed to stabilize it (see this article for more details). In contrast, the “stickiness” of the long sticky ends generated for T4P-LIC is by itself sufficient to hold the plasmid and insert together, allowing it to be transformed and the backbone repaired by ligases in the host cell.

ligation-independent.gifSo how are those long sticky ends generated? Well, it involves an ingenious use of the properties of T4 DNA polymerase, developed by Aslanidis and De jong in 1990. As shown in the diagram, the vector is first linearized by a restriction enzyme in it’s specially designed cloning site, then the T4 DNA polymerase comes in.

T4 DNA polymerase has two enzymatic activities: a 5′ to 3′ polymerase activity and a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity. Given the chance, the exonuclease activity would start at an exposed 3′ end and remove those nucleotides all day. The polymerase activity, however, balances the exonuclease activity by adding nucleotides at the 3′ end. The net result is that in the presence of all 4 dNTPs, nothing happens – every time the exonuclease removes a nucleotide, the polymerase replaces it.

In T4P-LIC this system is cleverly unbalanced to create the sticky ends. As shown in the diagram, the digested vector is treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of only a single nucleotide (dATP in this case). The cloning site of the vector is designed so that going back from the 3′ ends exposed after the restriction digest there are no adenine nucleotides until 18 nucleotides (on the left) and 16 nucleotides (on the right) in. This means that the exonuclease removes the nucleotides, but because dTTP, dCTP or dGTP are unavailable the polymerase can’t balance it’s activity until it reaches the dATP, creating the sticky ends as shown.

The insert is treated in a similar way. The insert is amplified by PCR using oligos with tails that, when treated with T4 polymerase and dTTP, will create overhangs compatible with those on the vector. The vector and insert are then simply annealled together and transformed. Because the left and right overhangs are different, the cloning is directional.

The advantages of T4P-LIC are that the procedure is simpler and more rapid than conventional cloning, the success rate is high – in my experience ligation independent cloning is successful around 90% of the time, and the protocol can be standardized since there is no need to take into account the actual insert sequence (because no restriction enzymes are used on the insert).

Commercial T4-mediated ligation independent cloning vectors are available from Millipore/Novagen and others, but it is very easy to make your own – just design your ligation independent cloning site, have it synthesized on oligos then cut out your current multiple cloning site from your favorite vector and replace it with the ligation independent cloning site. A good example of this can be found here.

If you do a lot of cloning and regularly find yourself in cloning hell, I would definitely recommend that you try out this technique.. your life will be a lot easier!

Originally published on January 8, 2008. Updated and revised on August 17, 2015.


  1. venus on March 5, 2008 at 9:25 am

    Thank you very much~!!

  2. Nick on March 5, 2008 at 8:43 am

    Hi Venus

    ATP is not required in the annealing step.

    DNA ligase does require ATP and in conventional cloning techniques, where the ligation is done in vitro, ATP must be added to the ligation buffer as you point out.

    However, in ligation independent cloning, the vector and insert are joined by base-pairing only, before being transformed.

    After transformation, the host’s DNA ligase repairs the backbone (i.e. the ligation is done in vivo) so there is no need to add ATP.

    For an explanation of how DNA ligase uses ATP, see this article: https://bitesizebio.com/2007/10/31/the-basics-how-does-dna-ligation-work/

  3. venus on March 5, 2008 at 4:26 am

    In annealing step, does ATP need certainly?? Because, I know that ligase shoud be needed ATP in ligation buffer.

  4. max on January 15, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Any out there who is actually using this on a routine basis? What protocols are you using? Is there any “standard” protocol for ligation-free cloning using T4 polymerase?

  5. max on January 11, 2008 at 11:18 am

    Kurt, have you really done this? I’ve played around with hetero-stagger PCR some time ago and just couldn’t find any positive clones at the time… do you know any particular things that were important when you’re doing this?

  6. Kurt on January 9, 2008 at 6:59 am

    LIC can also be combined with hetero-stagger PCR, to avoid the tedious T4 treatment of the PCR product, and allow direct cloning in the LIC vector:

    de Jong RN, Dani?«ls MA, Kaptein R, Folkers GE.
    Enzyme free cloning for high throughput gene cloning and expression.
    J Struct Funct Genomics. 2006 Dec;7(3-4):109-18.
    PMID: 17295099

  7. Nick on January 8, 2008 at 8:13 pm


    Actually, if you routinely clone into several different vectors, this technique should make like much easier – if you do some work upfront to convert all of your vectors to T4P-LIC vectors.

    The beauty of this technique is that you could use cloning site can be used in each of your vectors so the same insert could be cloned into each of the vectors and the cloning procedure would be exactly the same for each.

  8. Marc on January 8, 2008 at 6:08 pm

    That’s a pretty interesting technique!
    But I guess, the LIC is not so useful as soon as you’re using several different vectors… well you could use one basic T4P-LIC cloning vector for subcloning of your inserts… that would at least eliminate the efficiency problem of restrictions enzymes cutting at the ends of a PCR product.
    But I like the idea!


  9. Nick on January 8, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    Hi Andrew

    What polymerase do you use? If you use a good proofreading enzyme, mistakes should be rare. I normally use Phusion (see https://bitesizebio.com/2007/08/28/my-favorite-pcr-polymerase/) and I have never had this trouble.

  10. Andrew on January 8, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    But if you always have to use PCR to amplify the insert, you always have to check the sequence afterward. I’ve had too many PCR-clonings work perfectly only to find there was a tiny mistake in the sequence that ruined my construct to trust PCR clonings when I don’t have to. For “cut and paste” subcloning it may still be better to use regular restriction enzymes

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll To Top
Share via
Copy link