Faster, Even Cooler DNA Gels!
When I began a master’s program in 2008, the lab task I hated more than anything was running agarose gels for DNA. Something so simple, ubiquitous, and necessary gobbled up more hours in the lab than I care to remember. Even though we added the DNA stain directly to the molten agarose and didn’t have to spend time staining gels, gel electrophoresis still ate up entire days in the lab.
I figured that there had to be a faster way to do this.
A way to resolve small bands quickly
While waiting for one of my many gel runs to finish, I spent some quality time with Google to find a solution to my problem. I was introduced to Bitesize Bio for the first time when I came across this article, “Faster, Cooler DNA gels”. By using sodium borate (SB) electrophoresis buffer, you can crank up the voltage on the gel box without worrying about distorted DNA bands or even that the gel will melt. The payoffs are good resolution of small DNA fragments (~ 100 bp – 3 kb) and time saved with a shorter gel run. For example, a gel run in SB takes 25 minutes minutes vs. 45 minutes with TBE.
If you want to really get fancy, you can use 1 mM lithium borate (LB) to resolve fragments even smaller than 100 bp.
Being able to run my gels faster with a borate-based electrophoresis buffer was a revelation and allowed me to get much more done in the same amount of time. Why didn’t everyone know about this??
A snag – it doesn’t work with larger DNA fragments
Most of the time, when I wanted to run a gel to look for a band in the neighborhood of 300 bp – 2 kb, SB worked great. However, if I needed to gel-purify a vector, things got dicey. All of the bands of interest – cut vector, uncut vector, ladder, anything bigger than 4.5 kb – were fuzzy, diffuse, and just about useless. Even when I turned the voltage down to the speed of a moderately ambitious snail.
One big drawback that SB and LB buffers share with their cousin, TBE, is poor resolution of large DNA fragments. I learned this the hard way. Several times, in fact.
Lithium acetate (LA) buffer is the voltage-cranking equivalent to TAE, allowing quick resolution of large DNA fragments. This became my solution for gel-purification of vectors, but the downside here is poor resolution of small DNA fragments.
You can have it both ways!
So I went back to Google. I may even have used Google Scholar this time – that’s how serious I was about finding a single buffer that could handle the range of DNA sizes I worked with. In my case, I needed more resolution on the high end than the low end. Eventually I found this paper, which describes what amounts to a combination of LB and LA buffers.
Duh! Why hadn’t I thought of that?!
It took me several reads before I teased out the composition of lithium acetate-borate (LAB) buffer. In addition, this website lays out the recipe very nicely.
25X LAB buffer
- lithium acetate 16.5 g (250 mM)
- boric acid 15.46 g (250 mM)
- ddH2O to 1 L
- Make sure the pH is between 6.5 – 7.0
How to run a LAB gel
As with other agarose gels, you should make the gel with the same running buffer you plan to use during electrophoresis, which is 1X LAB. I typically run my gels at about 30 V/cm for 20 – 30 minutes. As you can see in this picture of a 1% gel made in LAB + GelRed, even the high molecular weight bands are pretty well resolved. Unfortunately, my DNA didn’t show up, but the DNA markers are gorgeous!
Last minute tips:
- You can cast agarose gels in advance to save on prep time. Just store at 4°C in some running buffer until you need them.
- For sharper bands, try using Ficoll instead of glycerol in your loading buffer. Your sample stays in the bottom of the well better and doesn’t start to diffuse before you have finished loading your gel.
If you like the idea of fast gel runs and awesome looking DNA bands regardless of molecular weight, you might want to give LAB buffer a try.
1. Singhal, H. et al. (2010) Improved DNA electrophoresis in conditions favoring polyborates and Lewis acid complexation. PLoS ONE 5:e11318.
2. Brody, J. R. et al. (2004) Ultra-fast high-resolution agarose electrophoresis of DNA and RNA using low-molarity conductive media. Biotechniques 37:598-602.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Hi I have a question,
does the unit “V/cm” refers to the length between electrodes or the length of the gel?
V/cm is a measure of the electric field, which spans the whole length between the electrodes. Hence the length between electrodes should be used
I love this recipe to run gels. I compared with TAE and TBE, and the heating difference is tremendous. So thanks!
I have to ask though… do you really run your gels at 30v/cm?? Or is it a typo?
The 2004 Kern paper ran some of their LAB at 1000V (100V/cm). A. Thousand. Volts. No 30v/cm is not a typo.
Cool! Thanks for putting this together.
The website you link to presents a different recipe for the same 25X buffer: –
For a 1L 25x Solution
25.5g Lithium acetate dihydrate
15.5g Boric acid
make up 1L with dH2O
Which one is it?
The answer is both! My lab uses anhydrous lithium acetate, where 16.5 g will give a final concentration of 250 mM in the 25x buffer. The recipe you listed uses lithium acetate dihydrate, where 25.5 g will also give a final concentration of 250 mM. To the best of my knowledge, there is no difference in the performance of the buffer whether the dihydrate or anhydrous lithium acetate is used.
when I tried the original faster better media system out there were some problems running restriction enzyme digests direction on the gel, something about the high salt content in the reaction. Is this a problem with this hybrid system?
I have not noticed any problems running restriction enzyme digests directly on a gel. That is typically how I purify cut vectors for ligation and I get well-defined bands.