Understanding Refractive Index
We all did it. We all did an experiment in elementary school exploring how images shift when viewed through water. This shift is refraction. Refraction happens when light transitions between two different mediums, such as air and water. The degree of refraction is influenced by several factors, the most significant of which is the speed at which light travels through different mediums. In your elementary school experiment example: light traveled through water slower than it did through the air. The amount of refraction is relative to this speed change. The degree of refraction is also influenced by the wavelength of the light. Different wavelengths refract differently between mediums (think rainbows). While you have been aware of this phenomenon for decades, you might not appreciate how much your microscopy image can suffer if you don’t optimize for refractive indexes. When optimizing your set up, you must take into consideration the properties of your specific experiments and how these properties will influence refraction. For example, many confocal experiments involve cells that are largely composed of water. As light leaves these aqueous-rich cells it may pass through any of the following mediums with different refractive indexes: oil, water, plastic/glass, media/mounting-media, and air (see Table 1 for common refractive indexes). The better we match up the refractive indexes of all of these mediums the better our ability to collect a high-resolution image. Table 1. Refractive indexes for common mediums in microscopyMedium | Refractive Index |
Water | 1.33 |
Glycerol | 1.47 |
75% Glycerol | 1.44 |
Immersion Oil | 1.51 |
Glass | 1.52 |
Mowiol (Mounting Media) | 1.41-1.49 |
Vectashield (Mounting Media) | 1.46 |
Flourmount (Mounting Media) | 1.40 |
Fresh Prolong Gold (Mounting Media) | 1.39 |
1-day-old Prolong Gold | 1.40 |
4-day-old Prolong Gold | 1.44 |
Mismatched Refractive Index
So what are the consequences of refractive index mismatches? Simply put, mismatches will refract your photons to an undetectable place causing a loss of information. This results in the following problems:- Spherical aberration.
- Chromatic aberration.
- Reduced resolution.
- Reduced scan depth in the Z-axis.
- Wasted time and effort.
Hardware Adjustments
In older microscopes, it was possible to adjust the image distance to correct for spherical aberration produced by refractive index issues (changing the tube length). However, this adjustment is not typically found on modern commercial confocal microscopes because of their complex nature. Instead, spherical aberrations caused by imperfect coverslip thickness, non-homogeneous specimens, or even temperature changes can sometimes be corrected if your objective has a correction collar. The most likely conditions that will benefit from correction are high numerical aperture (NA) objectives that have major jumps in the refractive index such as from air-to-glass, or from water-to-coverslip. Although complicated, other types of corrector devices exist commercially such as the InFocus™ Dynamic Optical Focusing System. But in reality, adjusting the hardware is a last-ditch and expensive effort. Instead, it is best to ensure you have optimized your setup first.Optimizing Your Setup
Every experiment is different and will require a different set of optimized considerations. But if you are planning on using a high NA objective (above 40x magnification) and want to visualize a deep structure, or are challenged by weak resolution, check through this list to optimize your set-up:1) Know Your Objective
Your objective has a wealth of information on it, including:- the optimal coverslip thickness;
- whether it is a water or oil immersion lens;
- if the objective has a correction collar.