Technical Skills
Soft Skills
Events
Podcasts
Resources
Get Involved

Join Us
Sign up for our feature-packed newsletter today to ensure you get the latest expert help and advice to level up your lab work.

Sign Up now

Should You Use Magnetic Beads for Immunoprecipitation?

Written by: Dr Nick Oswald

last updated: May 23, 2025

Sepharose beads are porous, which gives them a high surface area for interaction with proteins and allows them to hold a lot of liquid. This is perfect for the application that they were originally designed for: purifying milligrams of protein in columns.

When immunoprecipitation (IP) – a small-scale technique for pulling specific proteins out of solution using bead-bound antibodies – was first developed, we naturally used sepharose beads, since that is what we were used to, and we had them in the lab. But for IP, the porous structure cases a problem since:

  • The antibodies get trapped inside the pores and are difficult to wash away, so extensive washing is needed to reduce background levels
  • The washing steps for IP are done in microfuge tubes and liquid exchange is done by pipetting, so it is easy to accidentally lose sample in the washes
  • Diffusion is slow, so long incubation steps are required
  • Long incubation and extensive washing cause mechanical and proteolytic damage the proteins
  • All of these variables mean that the results are not as reproducible as we’d like

Improving the immunoprecipitation protocol using magnetic beads

Recently, there has been a  growing trend towards using magnetic beads, rather than sepharose down for IP as they solve all of the problems listed above. Magnetic beads have a defined diameter, are non-porous and are, (you’ve guessed it) magnetic. This means that:

  • There are no hidden surfaces for the antibodies to stick to so background, and the required number of washing steps, is reduced
  • Diffusion is faster, so incubation steps are reduced
  • Less washing and faster incubation times mean less chance of proteolytic damage
  • A magnet can be used to separate the pellet and supernatant, which reduces the chance of losing sample and makes everything a lot faster and amenable to automation
  • There are less variables so the process is very reproducible

So it looks like we should be switching to using magnetic beads for IP. What do you think?

Source: A rather excellent video called Immunoprecipitation On Bench Paper – A Surprising Shift, posted by LifeTechnologiesCorp on YouTube

Nick has a PhD from the University Dundee and is the Founder and Director of Bitesize Bio, Science Squared Ltd and The Life Science Marketing Society.

More 'Protein Expression and Analysis' articles

10 Things Every Molecular Biologist Should Know

The eBook with top tips from our Researcher community.