Skip to content

Five Fast Tips for Blotting Large Proteins

Western blotting can often be a source of frustration in the lab. Getting a beautiful Western is hard work, and it’s even more difficult when trying to visualize large molecular weight (>150 kDa) proteins.

Here are five tips you can use to get a great blot:

1.  Choose the right gel composition

With all of the gel choices out there, it can be overwhelming to determine which will work best for your experiment. The three most common gel types you will encounter are Tris-Glycine, Bis-Tris and Tris-Acetate. The name of the gel refers to the leading and trailing ions in the buffer system.

Tris-Glycine gels have a basic pH (8.6) and a short shelf life. The pH of the gel also tends to increase (up to pH 9.5) when running, causing protein degradation and low resolution blots.

Bis-Tris gels have a more acidic pH (6.4) increasing stability and shelf life. These gels require additional anti-oxidant in the buffer to maintain protein reduction as common reducing agents, such as DTT (dithiothreitol), do not travel with proteins in this system.

Tris-Acetate gels maintain a pH around 7, and separate out large molecular proteins with higher resolution than Bis-Tris or Tris-Glycine gels. Therefore, I recommend using Tris-Acetate gels when blotting for large proteins. Remember to use Tris-Acetate buffer with these gels – MOPS or MES buffer will not work!

2.  Get the best separation

Now that you have chosen a Tris-Acetate gel, there are a couple more things to consider. The percentage listed on a gel inversely relates to the pore size: the smaller the percentage, the larger the pores. Larger proteins travel more easily through larger pores, so I suggest using a low percentage gel, such as 7%.

Gels are made with one continuous pore size (non-gradient), or have increasing pore size throughout the gel (gradient). Gradient gels are great for new samples or if you are looking at a range of protein sizes. If you are looking for one protein, use a non-gradient gel.

3.  Increase SDS, decrease methanol

The composition of your transfer buffer is critical! Large proteins can precipitate out in the presence of methanol. Avoid this by decreasing the methanol percentage (10% or less) in your transfer buffer.

To further ensure your protein does not precipitate out, consider adding SDS to a final concentration of 0.1%. SDS adds uniform negative charge to proteins, making it easier for them to transfer from the gel and into the membrane.

4.  Mind the membrane

Membranes are either made of PVDF or Nitrocellulose. This post does a great job of describing the property differences between the two types of membranes. The takeaway for large molecular weight proteins is to use PVDF. Because large proteins can precipitate out in the presence of methanol, and PVDF membranes do not require any methanol in the transfer buffer, you have a higher chance of successfully transferring your protein to the blot using these membranes.

Both types of membranes are available in a variety of pore sizes, but the two most common are 0.2um and 0.45um. Just like with the gel, larger proteins can navigate through large pores more easily than smaller pores. Most proteins (>20 kDa) can be transferred with 0.45um membranes. Avoid using 0.2um pore size membranes for large proteins.

5.  Lengthen the transfer time

After carefully selecting your gel, membrane and transfer buffer components, you’re ready to rock! Semi-dry transfer is fast and convenient, but will not resolve larger proteins well. I advise using a wet tank transfer method. Because large proteins will transfer out of the gel very slowly, I recommend transferring for 90 minutes at 350-400 mA or overnight at 4°C at 40 mA.

If you follow these steps, you should have a beautiful blot showcasing your large molecular weight protein in no time!


Figure 1.Western blot of a high molecular weight protein. Image courtesy of Victoria Brown. 


  1. Olivia on August 22, 2019 at 4:32 pm

    At the transfer stage, if you do it for 3 hours, is this at room temperature? If so, do you pre-cool the transfer buffer or keep the tank on ice?

  2. Ido Livneh on April 18, 2017 at 2:07 pm

    Hi Victoria,
    If I got it right, you’ve been using Li-core Odyssey for your presented WB. I’m using it as well, an am very happy with its performance relatively to ECL. BUT – I find that even the low-fluorescence PVDF has some background, and although it makes my bands more visible, also the slightest scratch on the membrane is also “better” shown, and I ended up using nitrocellulose.
    What type of PVDF membranes do you use for the Li-Core (beyond the 0.45 specification)? Do you dry it and/or re-activate it with Methanol after transfer? Did you encounter any problems of high background? Any suggestions/tips?

    Many thanks,

    • pooja on August 2, 2019 at 4:14 pm

      I agree. i have done hmw proteins with nitrocellulose membrane with licor, with better efficiency (because of inherent background even in the low fl, PVDF), in my hands.

      Drying and rewetting, in my experience, did not enhance the quality significantly, but that might be me. I believe playing with the methnol concentration makes a difference.

  3. jordan on July 11, 2016 at 3:20 pm

    Could you give me a recipe for handcast Tris acetate gel pls?
    Is there a stacking and a resolving gel too?

  4. ISSA Hamoud on June 24, 2016 at 1:30 am

    what recommendations do you recommend to reduce high molecular weights protein in western blot. I am working on NCC and NKCC2 in kidney rats. and usually their molecular weight are in aroud 160 kd but I am getting them in range above 200 kd. What should I do ?
    I am using 7% resolving gel( H2O 10.2 ml, 5 ml 1.5 M Tris ph 8.8, 4.6 ml 30% acrylamide, and 200 microliter 10% SDS) then degas for 10 min then adding 100 microliter 10% APS and 15 microliter TEMED, then preparing 4% stacking gel ( 3.05 ML H2O, 0.65 ML 30% acrylamide, 1.25 ml 2.5 M tris ph 6.8, 50 microliter 10 SDS) then degas it for 10 min, then adding 50 microliter 10% APS and 10 microliter TEMED, and then upload it to resolving gel/

    • Dr Amanda Welch on June 24, 2016 at 2:23 pm

      Do you have a positive control? Something that you definitely know is the correct protein and that has a larger molecular weight? If your positive control is running at the correct molecular weight, then its a not a problem with your gel/blot.

      In that case, I’d start looking into troubleshooting the whole western protocol. How accurate is your antibody? Do you have a negative control? Do you get a band in that lane?

      I can’t remember if NCC or NKCC2 have any post-translational modifications (my PD mentor would be so upset with me!). If they do get post-translationally modified, then that could explain the increased weight.

  5. ISSA Hamoud on June 24, 2016 at 1:17 am

    I am working on NCC and NKCC2 on kidney rats with primary antibodies from Millipore company( NCC) and from LSBIO company (NCC2). usually their molecular weights are around 160 kd but I am getting weight above 200 kd.
    What do recommend to reduce their weights? what should I use?


  6. Priya on November 30, 2015 at 4:31 pm

    I am unable to resolve higher molecular weight protein Usherin 2A (540 kDa). Any suggestions on the % of gel or buffer etc is much appreciated.

    • Dr Amanda Welch on December 1, 2015 at 1:27 am

      What percentage gel are you currently running? Are you running a gradient gel?

      • Mafruha on February 27, 2017 at 6:20 am

        What % do gel do you recommend for 300kDa protein? All my lower MW proteins are getting transferred to the membrane but the higher ones are not, and my protein of interest is 300kDa. After transferring I stained the gel and noticed that the higher MW proteins are still mostly on the gel.

        • Turkia on September 15, 2017 at 2:02 am

          my protein of interest ~450kDa, I’m using 4% gel then stacking 4% . Run 5 hrs /200V. Transfer 90min.
          I use Nitrocellulose membrane, 20% methanol.
          Wish helps

  7. john hachey on June 2, 2015 at 5:17 pm

    good tips; typo point#2 second paragraph;

    “Non-gradient gels are great for… should be
    Gradient gels are great for… I believe

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll To Top
Share via
Copy link