Let’s imagine the following scenario:

You are researching a biosynthetic pathway in your favorite fungus. You know that this pathway produces a family of toxic compounds, and you want to see if you can block this pathway (or parts of it) with an antifungal drug.

You have a control (no antifungal) and samples that have received different doses of the drug. There is unfortunately no standard available but you expect the compounds to elute between 12–15 minutes along your gradient (because your supervisor told you so!).

## The problem

When you run your control, you can see a lot of things eluting between 12–15 minutes, but you can’t make out how many peaks there are as it’s just too crowded.

It’s not surprising that a family of compounds elute closely together, since they will have the same basic structure and therefore similar properties. You can’t do anything to change this fact.

How are you supposed to analyze this? You’re wondering what’s the point in running the rest of the samples, but don’t give up hope, at least not yet anyway!

## The solution

You can alter your gradient so that you ‘stretch out’ the part of the run where your compounds elute, so that they elute over a longer interval.

To start with, look carefully at the HPLC data, and determine the concentration of solvent when your compounds elute. Let’s say your supervisor suggested gradient A, where you go from 0% to 100 % acetonitrile in 15 minutes. You observe a lot of material eluting between 12 and 15 minutes, where the acetonitrile makes up 70–100 % of the mobile phase.

Now ‘stretch out’ this part of the gradient to run over a longer interval. ‘Tell’ the HPLC machine to increase the acetonitrile from 60–100% from 10–20 minutes (gradient B). This means that your compounds will elute over a 10-minute interval instead of a 3-minute interval. In HPLC lingo, this is referred to as improving the resolution of your run. It is a good idea to start stretching out the gradient from 60% to allow your compounds more time to separate (if they elute as early as 70%).

An example is shown in Figure 1.

The example given here represents just one approach to how you might go about optimizing your gradient. In reality, you could sometimes be faced with the opposite situation, where you notice that no compounds elute for the first 20 minutes of your run. In this case, you might speed that part up by increasing the solvent concentration faster, saving you a lot of time and potentially solvent.

Although HPLC is relatively straight forward once you get the hang of it, optimizing a gradient can be tedious and time-consuming and is very much a case of trial and error. You can go a long way by looking at your data carefully and making some common sense decisions!

Good luck HPLC-ing  🙂

## One Comment

1. Tomáš HLUSKA says:

You’re forgetting, that it takes some time to go through the column (depending on your column length and eluent speed), thus you must subtract that time to have the accurate % of B when your compounds start to elute. Yu can determine that easily by the very first peak on the chromatogram of unbound substances (or just calculate from the dead volume of column).
This in the case mentioned, the substances will not elute with 70-100%, but something like 65-95%.

Further, it is good to give it enough time to elute before changing the gradient slope. E.g. say the substance elutes between 20-30% and you will have the gradient at speed of 1%/min. If the dead time is 1 minute (i.e. there is delay between the desired % and when you see your substence on detector), you must extent the gradient to 31% or little more, especially if you use UV-VIS where the baseline is dependent on the pressure, which changes with the solvent composition.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.