New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

header image copy

10 Commonly Broken Good Laboratory Practices

by in Lab Survival
From the Bitesize Bio channel

What comes to mind when you think of good laboratory practices? To many, good laboratory practices describes the best conduct while working at the bench. The laboratory is a complex environment and understanding how small, seemingly innocuous, actions can have such a huge impact on the outcome of an experiment will help you to ensure that every run of an experiment is a successful run.

Think of memorable rookie research mistakes that you have made or seen others make, and you’ll have a good idea of what breaks the laws of good laboratory practice.

You might also find that you break the laws of good laboratory practice when you:

1. Wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) sometimes, not all the time.

Chemicals are often hazardous, and you can contaminate a sample when deciding to work with bare hands. Even if you do everything humanly possible to reduce the risk, there will always be a chance of something dangerous spilling, splashing or exploding onto your skin or clothes. Wearing proper PPE ensures that in the rare event of an accident you will be protected. PPE is inexpensive, durable and can be easily replaced, so wear your PPE every time.

2. Decide not to run a control sample.

Controls serve two very important purposes. They show whether or not your chemistry worked appropriately and they serve as the basis by which you can make a definitive comparison between groups of samples. Consider running an experiment without a control. The data that is collected is 0 overall; in essence, it appears as if the experiment did not work. Did it really fail to run, or is the data really as it is? Run a control sample every time so you know.

3. Update a laboratory notebook with only abbreviated details.

Often, you will revisit a project to review data before publication, rerun the experiment for validation or compare one experiment to another. Always making complete entries helps you to make sense of what you did in the past: “See network drive for data file” is great as long as you note which file it is… “The control sample did not work” is ambiguous until you describe the type of control sample and experimental conditions. Give yourself a helping hand and be thorough with everything you write in your laboratory notebook.

4. Don’t write anything down.

Of course, it helps to be consistent with record keeping. At the end of a project, your supervisor will want to review procedures and data from beginning to end. You can only show and tell so much at a laboratory meeting, so when it comes to anything you’ve done in the lab, one good rule to live by is, “If it wasn’t written down, it probably didn’t happen.”

5. Don’t calibrate your equipment.

An uncalibrated machine can measure fantastical values. And if you calibrate it, but select the wrong measurement mode, you can run into a situation where you grossly under- or over-measure how much stuff is inside your tube. Before using any piece of equipment, take a moment to ensure that it is properly calibrated first.

6. Use tools or equipment that are “too big” for the job.

A 100ul volume can be measured with either a 100ul or 1000ul pipettor, but the exact measurement between those two pipettors will differ. Even with a 1% error, the difference in volume pipetted could be 1ul or 10ul, respectively (+/- 10X). Every instrument has its limitations. Keep variability within your experiment low by selecting instruments that are the right size for your measurements.

7. Work through your math and units only once.

Practice the habit of double- and triple-checking your work. Before mixing up that expensive batch of media, review units and calculations to see that your numbers make sense.

8. Use samples before quality checking them.

Chemical carryover of chloroform, phenol, ethanol or salts from DNA or RNA extractions can halt reactions in other experiments. Checking the integrity and quality of your samples through spectroscopy, gels or other means is a simple way to find out if you need to clean up before moving on. Strive to generate the highest quality samples that you can, above and beyond any noted lab- and assay-minimum requirements.

9. Put off required refresher training.

Yearly refresher training may seem redundant, yet it serves a very important purpose: to ensure that all staff are on the same page when it comes to safety, conduct and responsibility. This training keeps important topics fresh in your mind. Who knows, one day you may draw upon it to help a colleague to return to good laboratory practices.

10. Communicate with your lab-mates sparingly.

The road to a successfully completed project is filled with collaboration and communication. The more you communicate with those around you, the better chance you have of accommodating everyone’s needs. This is especially important when all equipment and bench space is shared. And if you work in a lab that routinely does fluorescence microscopy, it’s always nice to have a heads-up before unexpectedly finding yourself having to work in the dark.

These 10 common examples show how good laboratory practices can be broken and why they are important to keep in mind while working at the bench. Many times recalibrating, remeasuring, or redoing an experiment is all that’s needed to return to best practices in the lab. What other conduct breaks good laboratory practice, and why is it noteworthy? Please share your experiences with us.

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

How to Shine in a Small Biotech Company

So you finally got your PhD (or your masters or batchelor’s) and you are making the big switch to a small biotech company. You will probably have been hired for the specific skill set that you have built during your training, but now you have to learn to apply those skills to solve real world, [...]

How To Use Your Department To The Fullest

“No one can whistle a symphony.  It takes a whole orchestra to play it.” – H.E. Luccock In my previous article on “Starting your PhD the right way”, I already mentioned the importance of using your department’s resources to your advantage. In this article, I will expand on how to use your department to the [...]

Should I Stay or Should I Go?

The recent Easter holiday got me thinking again about the ultimate question……whether or not to go in to the lab! I have asked myself this question many times around national and religious holidays and I have come up with a list of the top 5 reasons why going to lab during these times is a [...]

About the author

Jason Erk

Jason holds a BS in Biochemistry and is a faculty research assistant at an Oregon university. While current research efforts span the fields of behavior, neuroscience, and molecular biology, he manages copious amounts of data and freezers full of...

What do you think?

One comment

  1. from on

    to this I would add…
    Not evaluating results blindly.

    It’s amazing how often this basic tenet of science is forgotten. Even those who claim that they can “resist bias” are susceptible to the influence of expectations. Even doing a first-pass experiment without blinding yourself (and saying “I’ll repeat it blindly later if it works this first time”) can lead to a slippery slope. No one is immune to bias, conscious or not. Blind yourself to your conditions. . .

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »