For over 45 years, we’ve worked alongside scientists to help move their work forward. We go beyond providing tools, partnering with you to solve challenges, develop next-generation solutions and connect ideas that lead to stronger results.

Learn more about Promega

An Easy Guide to Choosing a Luciferase Reporter Assay

Choosing the right luciferase assay involves aligning reporter and detection systems with your experimental goals. Promega offers a range of options with varying brightness, signal stability, and workflow compatibility. Dual-reporter formats enhance normalization, while glow assays like NanoDLR provide both high intensity and stable signals, ideal for high-throughput, multiwell experiments.

Written by: Promega

last updated: June 26, 2025

Luciferase reporter assays are essential tools in molecular and cellular biology, offering sensitive and quantitative means to study gene expression, transcriptional regulation, signal transduction pathways, and cellular responses to various stimuli. 

With multiple luciferase reporters and detection reagents available, how do you know which one fits your specific workflow or readout needs?

Choosing a reporter and detection system that aligns with your experimental goals helps you tailor your luciferase reporter assay for the most meaningful results. 

This guide to choosing a luciferase reporter assay will help you navigate the options and key considerations.

Understand Your Luciferase Reporter Options

Luciferases are enzymes that produce bioluminescence through the oxidation of a substrate, emitting light that can be measured using a luminometer. 

Promega offers three primary luciferase reporters, each with distinct characteristics: Firefly Luciferase, NanoLuc® Luciferase  (engineered for deep-sea shrimp luciferase) and Renilla Luciferase. 

Each luciferase reporter has unique advantages, and the choice depends on factors such as size, brightness and compatibility with extracellular environment. See Table 1 below to compare their key properties.

Table 1. Summary of luciferase reporters and their key properties. *Destabilized versions available to more tightly couple to transcriptional response. **Secreted versions available.

Luciferase Reporter

Size

Brightness 

Approx Protein Half-life

Compatible with Extracellular Environment

Orthogonaility

Firefly Luciferase 

61kDa

+

3+ hours*

No, ATP-dependent

NanoLuc and Renilla

19kDa

+++

>6 hours*

Yes, ATP-independent**

Firefly

Renilla Luciferase

36kDa

+

3 hours

Yes, ATP-independent

Firefly

Consider the Detection Reagents

Signal stability, or the half-life of the luminescent signal, is another critical consideration, as it can influence your sample processing workflow. 

Typically, for a given reporter, signal stability and intensity are inversely related, with more progressively decreasing levels of initial brightness observed with respective increases in signal half-life. 

For example, the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter (DLR®) Assay produces a bright signal with high sensitivity, but the signals that decay quickly—firefly luciferase drops by 50% in about 12–15 minutes, and Renilla luciferase in less than 3 minutes—making it necessary to read samples immediately, often one at a time, or to use luminometers with reagent injectors.

In contrast, the Dual-Glo® Assay provides stabilized luminescence with approximately 2-hour signal half-lives for both reporters, allowing batch processing and compatibility with multiwell plate readers without injectors. 

However, the signal intensity for both reporters is decreased when compared to the DLR® Assay.  By paring firefly luciferase with the bright NanoLuc reporter, the Nano-Glo® Dual-Luciferase® Reporter System (NanoDLR) provides the signal stability observed with the Dual-Glo system, with increased signal intensity for both reporters. 

This improved design overcomes the brightness tradeoff seen with Dual-Glo® by introducing NanoLuc®, which is over 1000 times brighter than Renilla, and by enhancing firefly luciferase chemistry—resulting in a more robust assay with both stable and high-intensity signals.  

Luciferase Assay Signal Duration Comparison

Table 2 shows how Promega lytic luciferase detection systems compare in signal duration, intensity, and workflow compatibility—so you can quickly identify the one that meets your needs.

Table 2. Comparison of Promega lytic luciferase detection systems. * Fluc refers to firefly luciferase; Rluc refers to Renilla luciferase.

Assay System (Reporter)

Signal Type

Signal Half-Life

Key Characteristics

Luciferase Assay System (Fluc)

Flash

~12–15 minutes

High initial intensity; rapid decay; suitable for quick measurements with injectors.

Bright-Glo™ System (Fluc)

Glow

~30 minutes

Bright signal; moderate stability; ideal for high-throughput applications.

ONE-Glo™ System (Fluc)

Glow

~45 minutes

Robust performance; suitable for high- and ultrahigh-throughput assays.

ONE-Glo™ EX System (Fluc)

Glow

~2 hours

Improved stability; allows for reagent storage and flexible use.

Steady-Glo® System (Fluc)

Glow

~5 hours

Long-lasting signal; ideal for batch processing in multiwell plates.

Nano-Glo® System (Nluc)

Glow

>2 hours

Ultra-bright and stable; suitable for low to high-throughput processing.

Dual-Luciferase® (DLR®) System (Fluc/Rluc)

Flash

Fluc: ~12–15 minRluc: ~2–3 min

Requires immediate reading; suitable for small sample numbers with maximum sensitivity.

Dual-Glo® System (Fluc/Rluc)

Glow

~2 hours (both reporters)

Stabilized signals; compatible with multiwell plate readers without injectors.

Nano-Glo® Dual-Luciferase® (NanoDLR) System (Fluc/Nluc) 

Glow

~2 hours (both reporters)

Stabilized signals; high sensitivity for both reporters. 

Consider the Complexity of the Protocol

It’s also important to evaluate the complexity of the assay protocol. Non-homogeneous assays involve an additional step to create a lysate before adding the detection reagent, which can extend assay time and introduce variability. 

In contrast, homogeneous assays simplify the workflow by allowing direct addition of the reagent to cells in culture, eliminating the need for sample pre-processing.

Do You Need a Lytic or Live-cell Detection System?

Consider whether you need a lytic or live-cell reporter detection system. 

While this blog post focuses on lytic assays, live-cell luciferase formats for NanoLuc® and Renilla reporters are also available to support real-time and longitudinal analyses. 

Do You Need a Single- or Dual-reporter?

Consider also whether your experiment requires single-reporter or dual-reporter detection, the latter of which can be used for assay normalization or to measure two distinct biological responses in parallel. 

Choosing a Luciferase Reporter Assay Summarized

Tailoring your selection based on the above factors will help ensure a luciferase assay that aligns closely with your experimental goals. 

Promega offers detection chemistries with a wide range of signal durations—from high sensitivity flash assays like the Luciferase Assay System to glow format systems like Bright-Glo™ System, ONE-Glo™ EX System, Steady-Glo® System, and Nano-Glo® System.

To explore and compare luciferase assay characteristics, and find the best fit for your next experiment, visit Promega’s Luciferase Assay Selection Guide.

More 'Cloning and Expression' articles