Animal models have helped make enormous discoveries and breakthroughs in the last few decades. From Pasteur’s use of sheep to test the ‘Germ Theory’, Pavlov’s classic conditioning experiments in dogs, to Dolly the first cloned mammal, animal research has come a long way. Today, most drugs, vaccines and other pharmaceutical products for medical use are initially tested and validated in laboratory animals. In addition to medicine development, basic research uses a number of animals to study genetic, cellular, and molecular systems, physiology, and organ systems as well as behavior and evolution.
The guiding principles for ethical treatment of animals in testing and experimentation were first introduced by Russell and Burch in 1959 and are known as the three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement.1,2
Replace higher model organisms with lower ones, for example, use non-sentient beings (sentience can be described as the ability to be conscious, perceive pain or suffering and experience subjectivity).
Where possible, adopt in vitro or in silico alternatives such as:
Cellular fractions, whole cells, tissues or organs in culture, animal products
Mechanical or computer modelling that can simulate human biology or predict pharmacological properties of drugs
Artificial animals (dummies) and audio-visual aids to teach dissection and anatomy and to demonstrate protocols
Micro-dosing and clinical testing in humans
An interesting alternative to the use of animals to teach and practice surgeries in medical schools is the advent of the human-patient simulators that have a realistic human anatomy and physiology and can be programmed to bleed, breathe, convulse, and so on like humans.3,4
Various institutions and governing bodies have journals, websites, and databases that provide information and resources on alternatives to animal testing (e.g., ALTWEB,5 ALTEX,6 ALTBIB,7 DB-ALM8).
Replacement carries some disadvantages, though:
Complex systems cannot be studied using lower organisms
Research involving multiple cells or organ systems cannot be studied in vitro
Conducting behavioral studies can be challenging, if not impossible, without using whole animals
Not all in silico methods are equally reliable
Sometimes using animals might be difficult to avoid. In that case, you should strive to observe the second R.
Design experiments properly and calculate the number of animals needed
Plan studies where animals can be used as their own controls
Share animals between experiments or research labs (same batch of controls or different organs from same animal for various purposes)
Collaboration with statisticians to get the best possible results with the lowest number of animals
Perform thorough literature searches and consult experienced researchers to avoid repeating experiments already performed
Encourage publishing of negative data to prevent unnecessary repetition of experiments
Plan sensible breeding strategies for animals to avoid an excess in supply that may not be used for experiments
Disadvantages of reduction: statistical analyses may be affected by a small sample size, and journal reviewers may ask for repeat experiments to get data that are more significant. Nevertheless, being conservative with the number of animals you choose to start out with is always a good way to observe good ethical behaviour
When you conclude that animals have to be used for a certain experiment because no appropriate replacement exists and when no reduction of animals is possible (ruled out the first two Rs), then the third R becomes essential:
Refine experiments and protocols to minimize pain and distress in animals
Refer to standard guidelines and regulations and determine appropriate end-points and termination criteria for experiments
Acquire and provide proper training for careful handling of animals
Learn to identify pain and distress signals in animals
Understand their normal as well as abnormal physiology and behavior
Use appropriate analgesics, anesthetics, and/or anti-inflammatory drugs for animals under testing
Use non-invasive experimental procedures as much as possible
Pay special attention to animals during post-surgical care
Identify alternatives to the commonly used pain and disease-inducing reagents (such as Freund’s adjuvant, toxins, allergens or infectious agents) and to procedures (like foot pad injections, toe clipping, retro-orbital blood collection, ascites production or tumor induction)
Consult animal technicians and veterinarians if in doubt about any procedure or technique used or about the health and response of animals
Disadvantages are that refinement strategies require additional resources, training, and efforts. However, none of these limitations are excuses to compromise animal quality of life and welfare.
While it would be desirable to see a complete stop in the use of animals in research, it does not seem possible in the near future. The only options currently available to us are to replace animal models with alternatives where possible. Also, researchers are working to gradually phase out animal use by reducing the numbers of animals used in ongoing research, striving to develop treatments that are more humane, and improving the welfare of the animals that absolutely must be used.
One of the best parts of R is how extensible it is. Over the years, the community has put together hundreds (thousands?) of amazing packages to make your workflow easier. The downside of this wealth is that it can be hard to find packages that do exactly what you want! Therefore, I’ve put together a […]
It’s great to have you in the Bitesize Bio family! We’ve sent you an email to confirm your registration. Please click on the link in the email or paste it into your browser to finalize your registration.
For more information on how to use Bitesize Bio, take a look at the following image (click it, for a larger version)
An error occured while registering you, please reload the page and try again