Sepharose beads are porous, which gives them a high surface area for interaction with proteins and allows them to hold a lot of liquid. This is perfect for the application that they were originally designed for: purifying milligrams of protein in columns.
When immunoprecipitation (IP) – a small-scale technique for pulling specific proteins out of solution using bead-bound antibodies – was first developed, we naturally used sepharose beads, since that is what we were used to, and we had them in the lab. But for IP, the porous structure cases a problem since:
The antibodies get trapped inside the pores and are difficult to wash away, so extensive washing is needed to reduce background levels
The washing steps for IP are done in microfuge tubes and liquid exchange is done by pipetting, so it is easy to accidentally lose sample in the washes
Diffusion is slow, so long incubation steps are required
Long incubation and extensive washing cause mechanical and proteolytic damage the proteins
All of these variables mean that the results are not as reproducible as we’d like
Improving the immunoprecipitation protocol using magnetic beads
Recently, there has been a growing trend towards using magnetic beads, rather than sepharose down for IP as they solve all of the problems listed above. Magnetic beads have a defined diameter, are non-porous and are, (you’ve guessed it) magnetic. This means that:
There are no hidden surfaces for the antibodies to stick to so background, and the required number of washing steps, is reduced
Diffusion is faster, so incubation steps are reduced
Less washing and faster incubation times mean less chance of proteolytic damage
A magnet can be used to separate the pellet and supernatant, which reduces the chance of losing sample and makes everything a lot faster and amenable to automation
There are less variables so the process is very reproducible
So it looks like we should be switching to using magnetic beads for IP. What do you think?
Western blotting uses electrophoresis and antibody-epitope affinity to give a semi-quantitative and (theoretically) clear measure of protein abundance. It’s a long procedure, filled with many steps—and even more room for error. Learning to troubleshoot certain problems is incredibly important for continued success with this technique. So what do you do when your final imaged product […]
It’s great to have you in the Bitesize Bio family! We’ve sent you an email to confirm your registration. Please click on the link in the email or paste it into your browser to finalize your registration.
For more information on how to use Bitesize Bio, take a look at the following image (click it, for a larger version)
An error occured while registering you, please reload the page and try again