18 Ways to Improve your PubMed searches |
If you’re like me (before I wised up to the search power of PubMed) you probably just type in your topic of interest and press Go. And then you get back about 8 billion results, which—this is just a guess—is far more than you’re likely to read.
Here are a few basic tips to help you get the most out of your PubMed searches without wasting a lot of time slogging through pages of results, thus getting you back to the bench ASAP. Unless, of course, you’re avoiding the wet lab…not that I’ve ever used literature searches and background reading as an excuse to step away from the PCR machine…
Basic Searching
You probably already use them, but may not know their formal name. Boolean operators—AND, OR, NOT—are used to combine search terms, and in PubMed they must be in UPPERCASE.
Say you’re interested in articles about cell death in the postnatal olfactory bulb. Here are the results from a VERY simple search that is the likely starting point for most searchers. It may be a �good enough� search for you, but keep reading to discover ways to refine your results.
|
Search Terms |
# Articles |
Explanation |
| olfactory bulb AND cell death |
244 |
Basic starting search |
| olfactory bulb AND apoptosis |
163 |
Another term for cell death |
| olfactory bulb AND (cell death OR apoptosis) |
273 |
You want all possible articles on this topic |
| olfactory bulb AND (cell death OR apoptosis) NOT development |
181 |
But you don’t want papers on prenatal development |
Use * to replace one or more characters at the end of your search term. This can be very useful if you’re doing a broad search and will accept multiple forms of your search term, including plural.
Example: devel* (retrieves develop, develops, development, developmental, developing, etc.). Note that if you enter in too truncated a term, you will get a warning about only receiving the first 600 variations, so you’ll need to lengthen the root word search to get meaningful results. Also keep in mind that truncation restricts your search to keywords only.
This tool is extremely handy if you’re trying to locate a specific reference in order to access the full text (assuming your institution has a subscription). A very quick way to use it is to start entering the journal name (a menu of possible titles pops up), the publication year, and the last name of the first author (restricting choices to �only as first author�). You can be more thorough with the information you enter, but this strategy usually results in only one entry, or at most just a few, and then you can locate the one you really want.

Here’s another one you probably already know, but it’s worth pointing out just in case. Anytime you perform a search, the default results page is for �All� results, no matter the type of article. If you’re only interested in review articles, simply select the �Review� tab. In the example described above, there were 11 review articles for �olfactory bulb AND (cell death OR apoptosis) NOT development�, so that might be a good place to start, especially if it’s a new topic for you.

PubMed Databases
This one’s a biggie. MeSH stands for Medical Subject Heading, and is the controlled vocabulary used to index all of the articles in PubMed. Every article is indexed with multiple headings or subheadings. When you enter a term(s) into the PubMed search box, it is automatically translated into a corresponding heading—a lot of the work is done for you, behind the scenes. Headings are arranged in a hierarchy, and the subheadings are used to narrow down the topic.

In our cell death/apoptosis example, the term �cell death� is actually higher in the hierarchy than �apoptosis�, which is a type of cell death (along with necrosis and autophagy). PubMed searches will automatically include all of those terms lower in the hierarchy, unless you choose NOT to have them included (by selecting �Do Not Explode this term�).
Think of it this way: if you search for �cell death� you will automatically pull up articles related to �apoptosis� (broader search); if you search for �apoptosis� you will only pull up articles indexed as such, and will miss other cell death-related articles (narrower search). And that more specific search may be what you want.
Subheadings for cell death include drug effects, genetics, immunology, physiology, radiation effects. So if you’re only interested in the genetics of cell death/apoptosis, then you can select that subheading to refine your search and get rid of less relevant articles.
|
MeSH Search Terms |
# Articles |
| olfactory bulb AND cell death |
135 |
| olfactory bulb AND cell death/genetics |
18 |
| olfactory bulb AND apoptosis |
81 |
| olfactory bulb AND apoptosis/genetics |
15 |
| olfactory bulb AND (cell death/genetics OR apoptosis/genetics) NOT embryonic development |
16 |
Something interesting happens when you search for the term �development� in MeSH—you get 75 possibilities, including �staff development�, �United States Agency for International Development�, and �human development�. You’re only interested in �embryonic development� (i.e., to ultimately exclude it), so select accordingly.

Bottom line—why use MeSH instead of just entering in your search terms like you normally do? Primarily because using it helps you locate specific, highly relevant results very quickly. Try it, if you don’t already, and see what you think.
Also accessible via the blue left-hand column, the journals database has a couple of fun features. It provides links to full-text websites and also lets you see all of the PubMed-indexed journal titles arranged by subject matter (e.g., molecular biology, biochemistry, laboratory techniques and procedures). That can be handy if you’re trying to figure out where to send your own journal article (although I’m sure it will be accepted right off by Science or Nature).
Tabs
You may have never paid attention to them, but the 5 tabs underneath the PubMed search box provide a lot of useful features. If you use none of the others, at least become familiar with the Limits tab. This feature allows you to yet again refine your search, even the most basic variety, by specifying language, publication date, links to full text, type of article, and more. Especially useful if, say, you only want free full text in Portuguese published from 2000-2005 on Cancer-related articles using adolescent human females as the subjects (FYI, there are >150 articles with these parameters!).
The Preview/Index tab allows you to narrow a broad search term by adding additional terms. It’s a powerful tool that can really help with your search, but in the interest of brevity I just want to highlight one particular aspect—the Index button. Enter a search term, such as olfactory bulb, in the appropriate search box and select the Index button. What you’ll get is a huge list of terms followed by numbers in parentheses. That is, there are 9,845 articles indexed for �olfactory bulb�, with 80 for �olfactory bulb/abnormalities�, 36 for �olfactory bulb/blood supply�, etc. So if you take your original search of �olfactory bulb AND (cell death OR apoptosis) NOT development� (search results = 181) but decided you were only interested in the physiology of the olfactory bulb (index results = 2675) as it relates to this topic, you would select that from the index, add to your original search query, and get back a mere 37 results. Think of the time it saves you from having to go through all 181 original results!
| olfactory bulb (9845) |
| olfactory bulb/abnormalities (80) |
| olfactory bulb/analysis (125) |
| olfactory bulb/anatomy and histology (640) |
| olfactory bulb/blood supply (36) |
| olfactory bulb/chemistry (286) |
The History tab is absolutely invaluable for you to keep track of all of your current searches. It also makes it easier for you to combine searches, since they’re all identified by a number. So you can combine �olfactory bulb� (search #29) with �apoptosis OR cell death� (search #32) and development (search #33) like this: #1 AND #4 NOT #5. That way you don’t have to keep typing in the same search terms, over and over again.

The Clipboard tab is like a temporary holding bin for your search results. As you’re collecting results, you can send them to the Clipboard (up to 500 items) and then decide whether you want to email them, print them, and/or save them.
The Details tab lets you see exactly how PubMed is performing your search. For example, your relatively simple search for �olfactory bulb AND (cell death OR apoptosis) NOT development AND olfactory bulb/physiology� actually translates into PubMed as:
style=’font-size:10.0pt’>(“olfactory bulb”[MeSH Terms] OR olfactory bulb[Text Word]) AND ((“cell death”[MeSH Terms] OR cell death[Text Word]) OR (“apoptosis”[MeSH Terms] OR apoptosis[Text Word])) NOT (“growth and development”[Subheading] OR (“human development”[TIAB] NOT Medline[SB]) OR “human development”[MeSH Terms] OR development[Text Word]) AND “olfactory bulb/physiology”[All Fields]
Aren’t you glad you don’t have to type all of that? It’s always good to look at this information if you have any question about the particulars of your search, or if you get results that are either too narrow or even too broad—you can always refine the search and run it again.
Search Results
In brief, underneath the various tabs are a few options that allow you to choose how you want your results to be displayed. The default display is Summary, which lists basic information about the article. If you would also like to see the abstracts without having to click on the actual link (useful for printing/email), select AbstractPlus. If you want to see all of the MeSH terms associated with a given article, as well as the abstract, select Citation. Play around with the options to see what works best for you.
If you have a huge results list but are looking for a specific article within that list, Sort By allows you to arrange the results by Publication Date, First Author, Last Author, or Journal Title.
The Send To menu provides options on where to send your results: Text, File, Printer, Clipboard, E-mail, RSS Feed, or Order.
Links
Once you’ve selected an article and are looking at the abstract in PubMed, you may have noticed a list of articles entitled �Related Links� to the right of the abstract. These are articles that the powers-that-be at NCBI/PubMed have determined to be most similar to the article you’re currently looking at, and they’re displayed in ranked order from most to least relevant.
This list is created using a word-weighted algorithm based on words from the title, abstract, and MeSH terms. This related articles feature can be very useful when you’re exploring a new topic, and it can be a lot of fun to start exploring what’s essentially a trail of breadcrumbs…but be careful you don’t get lost while you’re looking and forget where you started!
Here’s yet another indispensible feature in PubMed (aren’t they all?)—many of the articles you’ll pull up in your searches also have links not just to the full text of that article (again, based on institutional subscriptions) but also to many of the bioinformatics/molecular biology databases and resources created by NCBI, such as Entrez Gene, HomoloGene, GEO Profiles, PubChem Substance, and many more.
That way you can jump immediately from the article to the hardcore data associated with that article—and once again save a lot of time by not having to search for the data in all of the individual NCBI databases. The shortcut to all of this information is simply displayed under �Links�, which is found to the far right on any PubMed results page. Note that the type of information available varies by article.
Search Support
My NCBI is a central place to customize all of the NCBI services. You can use it to save the results of your searches and to set up e-mail alerts to let you know when new articles are published on your topics of interest. You need to register for this service—I recommend you do so, at least to sign up for the automatic alerts. That way you’ll always be aware of new results in your field, particularly from journals that you might not check on a regular basis.
Finally, the last tip. This is the place to go if you have any questions or need more in depth information about PubMed, MeSH, or any of the features I’ve mentioned here. There’s lots to discover, so happy searching—and get back to the bench!
Many thanks to Melissa Ratajeski, MLIS, RLAT, for her help preparing this article.
Carrie Iwema has a PhD in Neuroscience, was a postdoc at Yale, earned a Masters in Library Science, and worked as a Basic Science Librarian for the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. She currently is a Molecular Biology Information Specialist for the Health Sciences Library System at the University of Pittsburgh. She can be contacted by email at iwema [you know what to add in the middle] pitt.edu.
To leave a reply you now have to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio
Pingback: Nerdy Science Blog » Blog Archive » Refine Your PubMed Search Results in 18 Ways
WTJ
this is really helpful! thanks for writing it. I think this post should be circulated around.
Eric
You briefly mentioned it, but don’t underestimate the power of “Send to: RSS Feed”.
I have an entire tab in iGoogle devoted to PubMed RSS feeds. Pretty convenient to revisit the same searches and avoid frequent email updates (if that’s not your thing.
-=E
CC
This is incredibly useful!!!!!!
Aaron Brown
I find the [TIAB] feature (search term has to be in the title or abstract) to be one of the most important features to use when searching pubmed, otherwise you get back abstracts that do not physically contain the terms you were searching for.
Chad
I also found this article very helpful, thank you.
Simon Lin
Here is the 19th way if you love PubMed and would like to see it everyday!
— A Google Gadget to keep you updated!
http://www.google.com/ig/directory?synd=open&q=g3p
The Google Gadget Gateway to PubMed (G3P) allows one to track authoritative source of information from PubMed subconsiously.
Robin
This guide is well written and informative. Thank you.
Ravi
Carie, tons of thanks for preparing this. We really appreciate your efforts.. Keep it up…
Creaky
Carrie,
Your list is super and I will write a post about the link on my blog (http://creakysites.wordpress.com). Thanks for compiling it!
Creaky
Alex
Have you tried CureHunter for searching Pubmed?
http://curehunter.com
We have a relational approach to mapping and searching Pubmed, focused on finding the best treatment options for disease, but you can search for any molecular compound:
http://curehunter.com/research/keywordSummaryD016572.do
Johansson
This was certainly helpful, I would also like to suggest now you have advanced web based tools which mine PUBMED and provide you the most relevant content. One such tool which I offlate got to know was XTractor (check this out at http://www.xtractor.in)
this provides manually annotated content from PUBMED everyday for free
Lancy
Hi Johan,,,
Thanks for your comment on XTractor – it was a real nice experience using the system. Also the team got in touch with me and they have this new commercial version – which has semantic search, and a knowledgebase of more than 150K which is encouraging to know and one of the splendid efforts across the globe..
Thanks
Lancy
Pingback: Considerations around the upcoming pubmed’s enhancements | Knowledge beyond words