New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

Restriction Enzyme Digestion at the End of a Vector

asked by by on

Hi all,

Has anyone ever tried a restriction enzyme digest where the site is literally on the end of a vector? I’m trying to do a cloning experiment right now, cloning a 2.8kb insert into pET14b and the two multiple cloning sites on my vector that I must use (to prevent cutting my insert) actually share a base so that after my first digestion there isn’t a single base pair before my next RE site. I’m cutting with XhoI then BamHI sequentially.

MCS:
CTCGAGGATCC
GAGCTCCTAGG

after cutting:

CTCGA GGATCC
G AGCTCCTAGG

The GGATCC sequence (BamHI) is my second site. On New England Biolabs website for cleavage close to the end of DNA fragments it doesn’t even have information about cutting with ZERO base pairs before your RE site which I’m assuming means that it’s probably not going to work too well.

I’ve tried the transformation a couple of times. My first was an attempt with dephosphorylation and got nothing but I didn’t perform a positive control and the buffer I was using ended up causing trouble for other members of my lab, so I decided to try again.

When I tried running ligating the insert directly into the sequentially cut vector without dephosphorylating it I had more colonies on my negative control (vector with no insert ligated) than I did on my actual experiments although the transformation efficiency wasn’t great (around 3×10^5).

I tried it again last night with dephosphorylation and I again got nothing on all of my plates except for the positive control.

I’m thinking that this approach needs to be abandoned or at least modified because it looks like the second digest with BamHI just isn’t working. Does anyone have any good ideas about how to increase the chance of a cut in such inoptimal conditions? I ran with BSA for three hours and 10 units BamHI per ug of plasmid DNA.

Have an answer?

2 answers

  1. from on

    My after cutting diagram didn’t work so well because of autospacing, so here it is a little more clearly:

    after cutting:

    CTCGA_____GGATCC
    G_____AGCTCCTAGG

  2. from on

    Hello KirkSZ,

    i cloned about 1000 different vectors in my career. From my experience the Xho site is to close to the BamHI site in pET14b. I would suggest to use BamHI/XbaI if possible. Otherwise you won’t have any positive clone!

    Regards Yves

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »