New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

Warning: Dihydrogen Monoxide is Worse Than Ethidium Bromide

by in Fun stuff, Lab Survival
From the Bitesize Bio channel

ethidium-bromide-safetyPlease read and pass this life-saving information on to your friends.

A chemical that all of us use in the lab has turned out to be highly dangerous. It is an asphyxiant, can cause severe burns and is a contributor to the greenhouse effect. Medical organizations all over the world confirm it to be responsible for killing thousand of people, of all ages, every year.

Although there is no confirmed causative effect, there is also evidence to suggest that it is involved in the formation of cancer and has been found in excised tumors of EVERY kind.

Yes, spread the word. Dihydrogen monoxide, or hydric acid, is the silent killer that each of us are exposed to every day. If you need any further convincing, please visit the dihydrogen monoxide research division for further information.

But don’t worry. Safe alternatives and are already being developed and will be available soon… or if you feel compelled to continue to use dihydrogen monoxide you will also be able to buy disposal kit to minimize your impact on the environment.

Ok, so it’s a spoof. But interestingly, everything I have written (apart from the part about safe alternatives and disposal!), and everything on the dhmo.org site, is 100% accurate. It’s easy to see how, in the absence of critical thinking on the part of whoever receives this information, the fear of dihydrogen monoxide, or hydric acid (or water, just in case you didn’t get it yet) could be worked up into a hysteria.

But as scientists, inherently critical thinkers, we would never allow something like this to permeate into the scientific community, would we? We would never blindly accept a scare story like this, without examining the evidence. And we would certainly never allow blind acceptance to develop into such a hysteria that we would spend good money expensive “safe” substitutes and “environmentally friendly” disposal methods for our already safe, cheap and useful chemical.

Well, what about ethidium bromide? The popular myths about the dangers of ethidum bromide are just that – myths. There is no evidence to implicate ethidium bromide as a carcinogen or a mutagen in humans, and in fact there is evidence to suggest that it is perfectly safe.

If you feel the need to perpetuate the myths and the hysteria, about ethidium bromide you are free to do so. But before you do, it is your responsibility as a scientist to do one thing – read the evidence. If after doing so you still think that ethidium bromide unsafe, then continue as you were – but don’t be guilty of blind acceptance. That’s just not science.

Looking for a good place to start your investigation of whether ethidium bromide is safe or not? Click here.

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

Wellcome Image Awards 2008

After yesterday’s bit of whimsical late-night creativity, I thought that today might be a good time to share the results of the 2008 Wellcome Image Awards. These images have been captured using both traditional and cutting-edge imaging techniques, from the simple light microscope to the latest in computer-aided imaging. Their artistry is astounding, and brings [...]

I’m Not That Kind of Doctor: A Guide for Enjoying the Holidays

As a graduate student or a card-carrying PhD, you may have discovered that you unwittingly (and probably inappropriately) have become the authority in your family on all things scientific and health related. For this reason, the upcoming holiday season might harbor some additional family-related stress for you. Before you shout “I’m not that kind of [...]

A Classification System For Scientists

To the general public, scientists seem all seem pretty much the same. However, as someone who has studied these fascinating beasts up close I have found that there are in fact several distinct species within this genus. In order to promote public understanding, I propose a classification system that groups scientists together based on exhibited [...]

About the author

Nick Oswald

Nick Oswald started Bitesize Bio on a Macbook on his kitchen table in 2007 while in his 7th year of working as a molecular biologist in biotech. He made it his day job in 2010 and has been loving it ever since.

What do you think?

7 comments

  1. from Chad on

    A more senior lab tech I work with told me he wanted to get rid of all the EtBr in the lab and replace it with something that doesn’t cause cancer. I told him to shut up and check the research.

  2. from on

    They claim that flash gels are 10 times more sensitive as ETB, right? Given that there are not thousands of stains available, couldn’t it be that there’s sybr gold in the flash gels?

    By the way: Has anyone ever tried to build a transilluminator with blue LEDs? I’ve tried one of those cheap blue keyring flashlights recently and could see my bands, but not too well. In theorie a blue flashligt should work better than a UV transilluminator and that’s also what they probably built into the flash gel frame…

  3. from on

    Kurt,

    Sure there are more sensitive dyes, but given that EtBr is cheap and sensitive enough for most applications, there is no inherent reason to get rid of it.

  4. from on

    Hey NICK….. what I feel is that old, conventional myths take time to subside and it is really difficult to convince people. But science is truth, it needs evidence. Science and myths are two opposite things, they can’t exist together.
    Good going
    Each one should teach one about EB.

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »