New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

Pin-pointing DNA Ligation Problems

by
From the Bitesize Bio channel

pin-point.jpgIn any experimental procedure, getting the controls right can save you a lot of work when things go wrong by allowing you to pin-point the source of the problem. DNA ligation is no different. In this article I look at how to set up a ligation reaction with a complete set of controls, and use them to pin-point the cause of your ligation problems.

First a bit of background…

Ligation reactions fall into two categories, depending whether you are trying to join blunt or sticky DNA. Although the set-up is slightly different, the controls are basically the same for both types of reaction. In this article I am talking about ligating a single insert into a vector.

dna-ligation-equation.gifThe ligation reaction begins with a linearized vector fragment, to which an equimolar (or molar excess) of insert is mixed, along with DNA ligase in an appropriate buffer. The ligase joins the vector and insert pieces creating a covalently closed, circular vector from the initial linearized DNA. I normally use 50ng of vector, then calculate the amount of insert required for one molar equivalent using the equation shown on the right, so my ligation mix for a 5 kbp vector and a 1kbp insert would look like this:

  • 50 ng vector
  • 10 ng insert
  • 1 microliters 10x ligase buffer
  • 1 microliters DNA ligase
  • water to 10 microliters

Adding a molar excess of insert can increase the chances of ligation, depending on the insert size, so it is often advisable to try a few vector:insert ratios. You can get more info on how ligation works here.

After ligation, the reaction mixed is transformed into competent E.coli. The fact that E.coli can be efficiently transformed by circular, but not linear, DNA is the basis for determining whether a ligation has been successful. The number of colonies obtained from transformation with covalently-closed, circular DNA depends on the competency of the cells and the amount of DNA present. Assuming we use the same competent cell prep for our ligation and controls, the number of colonies formed will be dependent on the amount covalently-closed DNA we have in each reaction i.e. how successful the ligation has been.

And now onto the controls. To orientate you, here is a summary of the controls I am about to explain:

ligation-controls.gif

Controls 1 and 2: Vector background

The vector preparation is a crucial part of the cloning procedure. If even a small amount of undigested vector carries through into the ligation, this will be transformed efficiently and will give colonies. These colonies harboring non-insert-containing vector are called “background” colonies. More information on preparing vectors to reduce background colonies can be found here.

Another source of background is re-ligation of the vector. If the linear vector has compatible ends (e.g. blunt ends, or compatible sticky ends), then the ligase will efficiently join them to create circular, transformable DNA which will result in background colonies. A phosphatase treatment will reduce the possibility of re-ligation and reduce background, but it is often not perfect.

Whatever the source, it is vitally important to know how much background there is in a ligation reaction. To determine the amount of background, a parallel ligation reaction should be set up, with the insert replaced by water, this is control 1. Any colonies formed from transformation of this control will be the result of undigested or re-ligated vector and subtracting the number of colonies formed from this control from the number of colonies formed from the ligation will give an idea of whether the ligation reaction has been successful. The ideal scenario is that there are few or no colonies in the control and tens, hundreds or thousands in the ligation.

If your ligations are going well, control 1 is sufficient. However, if you are experiencing problems, the rest of the controls I describe here will help you pinpoint their source. Control 2 is similar to control 1, but without the ligase. Colonies formed from transformation of control 2 can only be the result of undigested vector, not vector re-ligation, since there is no ligase present. If you are obtaining a high number of background colonies, comparing controls 1 and 2 will allow you to determine whether the problem is due to undigested vector or vector re-ligation.

Controls 3 and 4: No colonies!?

The other side of the coin as that you get very few, or no, colonies. This could be because of problems with the competent cells or transformation procedure, use of the wrong antibiotic or problems with the ligation reaction, such as poor ligase activity. The remaining controls allow you to distinguish between these possibilities.

Control 3 uses a known amount (about 0.1ng is good) of the undigested parent vector. If no colonies are obtained from transformation of this, the problem is either in the transformation procedure, the competent cells or antibiotic selection. Obviously the next step would be to try new cells, or review your procedures in this case. If the transformation is a success, you can calculate the competency of the cells by counting the number of colonies obtained from the transformation – details on how to do this are here. Realistically, the minimum competency of cells for cloning should be 1×10^6 colony forming units per microgram of DNA. If your cells are below this, this is likely to be the problem and you should re-do the transformation with a fresh batch of competent cells.

For control 4, you need to prepare ahead. Take a reasonable amount, say a microgram, of any vector and digest with a single enzyme then run on a gel and isolate the band. This can now be used to test whether your ligase is working properly. Run a ligation reaction with this vector plus and minus ligase, then transform. Compare the number of colonies on the two plates. If the ligase-containing reaction has significantly more colonies (at least 5-10x) than the ligase minus plate, then the ligase is likely to be working fine. If not, the ligase may be a problem. Beware with this control though – the problem could still be in your vector prep! The best approach is to make up a large batch of the digested vector then validate it with fresh ligase. When you know the vector prep is good you can then use it to check future ligase batches.

Any questions or additions? Add them in a comment below.

Photo: Fishball

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

Types of Statistical Errors and What They Mean

This column is loaded with pop quizzes for you to test yourself on. If you haven’t already done so, catch up on yesterday’s piece on hypothesis testing for a refresher. Take a gander at the table below for a summary of the two types of error that can result from hypothesis testing. Type I Errors occur [...]

How to Build a Plate Centrifuge for $25

I recently visited a lab that had a salad spinner on their lab bench and at first I wondered if they were putting together a salad lunch there but when I took a peek I got a nice surprise. It turns out that the salad spinner was actually a bench top, “minifuge” version of a [...]

Book Review: Time, by Eva Hoffman

If there is one certainty in life, it is that time has always been there, and will always remain. But although it is a basic fact of our existence, most people don’t tend to reflect much on the characteristics and implications of time. Neither do I, as I realised when I read Eva Hoffman’s book [...]

Around the Blogs

We’ve reached the end of another week here on Bitesize Bio, so let’s close with the usual survey of what’s happening Around the Blogs. Luckily, the post titles speak for themselves… Society Which baby do you want? A dilemma for the 21st century parent-to-be The goal of a science education Scientists are excellent communicators, or [...]

About the author

Nick Oswald

Nick Oswald started Bitesize Bio on a Macbook on his kitchen table in 2007 while in his 7th year of working as a molecular biologist in biotech. He made it his day job in 2010 and has been loving it ever since.

What do you think?

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »