New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

Fluorescent Neurons Over the Brainbow

by in Journal Club
From the Bitesize Bio channel

Site-specific recombinases have, for the past 20 years, been one of the most powerful tools in studying the functions of all sorts of genes. Most widely used as the Cre/lox-based system for inserting or deleting genes in mice, transgenic analyses have told us volumes about animal development1. For instance, mouse genetic knockouts are routinely the most convincing method available to determine the most vital function of a given gene product.

In some tissues however, imaging of intricate cellular structures is very difficult. In the brain, for instance, it can be difficult to distinguish one cell from the next in a synaptic circuit, and even more challenging to render a map of neural connections that include divergence and convergence of synaptic relays between many neurons. Fluorescent labels and other staining techniques have been used, to limited effect, but ‘connectomic’ maps of many or all neurons has been beyond the reach of available methods.
brainbow
Enter Jeff Lichtman and colleagues2. Their paper in this week’s Nature offers an innovative approach to the problem: Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. The method, which they call a ‘Brainbow’ system, takes the existing Cre-lox transgenic method and turns it into a combinatorial expression approach. Their approach actually involved two genetic strategies used in tandem, for stochastic expression of multiple fluorescent proteins (XFP’s) from a single transgene. Brainbow-1 used Cre-mediated excision between pairs of incompatible lox sites, alternated to create mutually exclusive recombination events. Brainbow-2 used Cre to invert DNA segments delimited by loxP sites in opposite orientation, positioned in tandem to generate several recombination outcomes. The differential expression of multiple copies of these constructs generated XFP mixtures, allowing the labelling of individual neurons and glia with as many as 90 distinguishable colors.

The result is a pretty impressive proof-of-concept demonstration. Figure 5 (above) is just amazing, depicting cerebellar circuit tracing and color analysis.

Neuroscientists have mapped the brains regions fairly well on the anatomical scale, and shown neural processes on the cellular scale. The inference has long been that when massive amounts of neural circuitry come into play, then new properties emerge, such as consciousness. Brain imaging techniques such as functional MRI have shown us where consciousness is manifested in the brain, but not how. Maybe this new technique will help us to resolve how different neural circuitries influence consciousness*.

* = Livet et al. make no mention of this speculation, that is all me.

  1. Branda CS, Symecki SM. (2004) Talking about a revolution: The impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev. Cell 6:7-28. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00399-X
  2. Livet J, Weissman TA, Kang H, Draft RW, Lu J, Bennis RA, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. (1 Nov 2007) Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450, 56-62. doi:10.1038/nature06293

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

Gene Regulatory Networks during Development

Gene regulatory network (GRN) circuits are collections of DNA segments in a cell which interact with each other (indirectly through their RNA and protein expression products) and with other substances in the cell, thereby governing the rates at which genes in the network are transcribed into mRNA. A lot of research has gone into (a) [...]

The Biased Choices of Cells

Here’s one of my favorite journal articles from the past year – an elegant study by Natalie Andrew and Robert Insall published in Nature Cell Biology: Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. From the introduction: We have made detailed, quantitative observations of Dictyostelium cells chemotaxing [...]

IRESs and Negative Data

Nature Precedings represents a step forward for disseminating experimental results in the internet age. Especially ‘negative’ results, that might not have gotten published otherwise, but is extremely helpful to other researchers in trying to avoid making the same mistakes. Refutation of a hypothesis, while not a discovery, is the goal of the well-planned experiment in [...]

FAK and Lamellipodia

Yesterday, I ended a post about FAK, Pyk2 and regulation of RhoA activity by asking “So, what about Rac regulation by [FAK] and Pyk2?” Today, let’s discuss a paper relating FAK/Pyk2 function studies on Rac1: Regulation of lamellipodial persistence, adhesion turnover, and motility in macrophages by focal adhesion kinase. Katherine Owen, et al., focus on [...]

About the author

What do you think?

4 comments

  1. from apalazzo on

    Wow, the neuro circuitry of the brain revealed. This will help the neuroscientists immensly. How many fluorescent proteins are they using? I’m guessing that the “90″ come from a the combinatorial expression of many different proteins produced from the Tsien lab. I’ll have to check out the paper ….

  2. from on

    The XFPs that they used were RFP, CFP and YFP, with a fourth possibility added on apparently as an afterthought (Orange/OFP for Brainbow-1; GFP for Brainbow-2). The result, more clearly shown in Figure 4 in the paper, looks kinda like the results that you’d expect if you were a painter mixing colors.

  3. from Keith Robison on

    I’m afraid I have to complain that your title has my least favorite scientific spelling error — there’s no flour in GFP!

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »