New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

pcr-ethylene-glycol

Better Than Betaine: PCR Additives That Actually Work

by in PCR & Real-time PCR, Tech Tips
From the Bitesize Bio channel

The problem of amplification of DNA templates containing high GC content continues to annoy researchers despite the many strategies developed to overcome this issue.

Betaine is the most common additive used to enhance amplification of GC rich sequences because of its ability to dissolve secondary structure that blocks polymerase action.  But betaine does not solve every PCR issue related to GC overload.

Lucky for us, a team of researchers at the Harbin Institute of Technology and Tianjin University of Science and Technology in China have discovered two new additives for PCR that work even better than betaine.

Their paper, entitled: Enhanced amplification of GC-rich DNA with two organic reagents, can be found in the September 2009 issue of BioTechniques (vol. 47, No. 3, page 775)  and I’ve summarized the results of the paper here.

What are these new additives?

According to the report, ethylene glycol and 1,2-propanediol are the two superior ingredients for decreasing the melting temperature of DNA and getting GC-rich PCR to work.

The Strategy:

In order to examine their ability to enhance difficult PCR templates, the authors randomly selected 104 GC-rich human genomic amplicons with lengths between 700-800 bp and with GC content between 60-80%. The additives were used at final concentrations of 1.075M for ethylene glycol and 0.816M for 1,2-propanediol. Betaine was used at a final concentration of 2.2M. All amplification reactions were performed at least 3 times to ensure the accuracy of results.

The Outcome:

The researchers put together an extensive table that summarizes the results of PCR for 104 amplicons. In summary, 13% (14) of the amplicons amplified without any additives. 72% (75) worked with just betaine alone while 90% (94) worked with only 1,2-propanediol and 87% (91) were successful with the addition of ethylene glycol alone.  While three reactions were rescued with betaine and not the other additives, overall performance was improved using these the ethlyene glycol or 1,2-propanediol.

Unexpected results:

Interestingly, in some cases betaine showed a PCR inhibitive effect. Several of the reactions that worked only with ethylene glycol or only with 1,2-propanediol failed when betaine was added back into the reaction in addition to the new additive.

What is the difference between additives?

The authors close their article by referencing several papers that discuss the impact of betaine and ethylene glycol on DNA melting enthalpy and theories that suggest differences in affinities of betaine and ethylene glycol to ssDNA and dsDNA may be playing a role.

While the mechanism of action of ethylene glycol and 1,2-propanediol on melting GC-rich templates it not fully understood, it is definitely  functioning differently than betaine. More studies in understanding how these reagents function may uncover additional novel uses for ethylene glycol and 1,2-propanediol in molecular biology besides PCR.

Have you tried these additives in your PCR? How well did it work for you? What are you tips for getting GC-rich templates to work in PCR?

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

PCR vs qPCR Sensitivity

One of the great features of PCR is its excellent sensitivity as we know. And many articles describe real-time qPCR as an added leap forward in that sensitivity – to the point where it has become a standard feature of a new assay description Indeed, I’m currently developing a new qPCR assay to replace a [...]

The Taq behind PCR

Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis is generally credited with inventing the polymerase chain reaction, but his discovery owes a lot to a microbiologist who loved to travel, some refuted assumptions of what can live in hot springs, and a now-closed field station in Yellowstone National Park. Here’s the story. In the 1960s, Thomas Brock was a [...]

About the author

What do you think?

8 comments

  1. from Yakko on

    Thanks for this article.
    Unfortunately, the link to the BioTechniques article is not good – or their website is down.
    Do you know any other way to access to this article? Or maybe could you put it online for the community?

  2. from Anthony on

    I add 1 ?L DMSO or 1-2 ?L 50% glycerin to a 25 ?L reaction, and it usually works fine for me.

  3. from Yakko on

    Hi Nick,
    Thanks for the new link. But I really feel that the website was down in Japan at this time (but not from US/Eur, as a “traceroute” confirmed it).
    Anyway, it’s working well now, I’ll check out this article.

    • from on

      No problem Yakko — I am glad it works now! :)

  4. from David G. on

    Yes combination with DMSO Betain or glycerol can enhance PCR. I’ve used also lower elongation temperature, that can work well for pentaplex PCR with high GC content…

    I think I will try these suggestions for my next PCR optimization…

  5. from Heather on

    The authors used 10M Betaine, which is a bit much, if you ask me. I’ve never really used more than 4M in any reaction. It would have been better for them to do a titration of concentration.

  6. from on

    nothing works better in my lab than d-trehalose dihydrate at final concentration of 0.2M.

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »