New Channels on Bitesize Bio

To help you find information on exactly what you need we're implementing channels, a new way to browse content

Each channel is focused on a specific technique or area and authored/presented by hand-picked authors who are experts in their field. Make sure you don't miss a thing by checking the box below for each channel that interests you.

In return we'll send you one email per month that brings you the latest from your chosen channel(s), along with free members-only content.

Check out our upcoming new channels; Flow Cytometry and Cell Culture, we'll be launching them very soon!

I would like to receive the newsletters for the following channels

Cell Culture
Flow Cytomery
Microscopy & Imaging
Next Generation Sequencing
Writing, Publishing and Presenting
Cloning & Expression


My email address is:

A Classification System For Scientists

by in Fun stuff
From the Bitesize Bio channel

evolution2.jpgTo the general public, scientists seem all seem pretty much the same. However, as someone who has studied these fascinating beasts up close I have found that there are in fact several distinct species within this genus.

In order to promote public understanding, I propose a classification system that groups scientists together based on exhibited behaviour and alterior motives, rather than using purely DNA-based criteria. Please note that all of the following still fall under the Order Primates, but have been re-classified in the newly created Family Academiae.

Scienticus intrinsica – This is the true scientist. It would happily run DNA gels for 10 hours/day in a windowless basement lab, if it thought that doing so would bring it closer to an ultimate truth. Its strength is in its passion and drive for the truth, but sadly this is also its weakness. When things go awry, it is far more frustrating for S. intrinsica than for other members of Academiae, and its personal life is likely to suffer. Generally it enjoys quick to eat food (i.e. simple cold cut sandwiches).

Scienticus meticulii – Often mistaken for its close relative S. intrinsica, the solitary S. meticulii would also happily run gels for long hours in an empty room. What differentiates it from similar species is its close attention to experimental detail, and its desire to complete every procedure perfectly. Unveiling hidden truths is not nearly as stimulating for S. meticulii as is completing a Western blot with perfectly rectangular black bands. It tends to eat diagonally cut peanut butter and jam sandwiches with the crusts removed.

Scienticus renaissancus – This is the most common species found in most educational institutes. Attempting a balanced life is important for S. renaissancus, although this is achieved to varying degrees. While it still considers precision and success in research to be important, it often suffers academically when competing directly with species that allocate most of their resources to work. Most are generalist eaters, but especially enjoy sit-down restaurants that allow for socializing.

Scienticus narcisster – Although also a hard-worker, S. narcisster aims mainly to see its name in publications as frequently as possible. It often takes on pieces of many projects, regardless of how easily it can complete them on time. It enjoys eating small cubes of cheese on toothpicks, while dropping the names of professors it has met at Stanford.

Poserum commonalis – At first glance, it is sometimes indistinguishable from members of the genus Scienticus. By befriending important members of its department, and putting in as much face time as possible with its superiors, P. commonalis is sometimes able to achieve a degree while also conserving most of its resources. Although it is far less skilled in academic work than its relatives, it can be equally successful if not more so. Like S. renaissancus it is a generalist eater, but tends to feed when others most require their assistance.

Since this classification system is still in its earliest stages, I am aware that further work will be required to fully describe this genus and I would be grateful for any input you may have. Are you, your colleagues or individuals that you have observed in the field sufficiently described within this system? If not please leave a comment providing details of classifications that you think would clarify the system further.

Articles in your inbox

Enter your email to be informed when we publish more articles like this on BsB, and also get access to all of these goodies:

  • Free ebooks and audiobooks on the topics that matter to you
  • Access to Member’s-only articles and Videos
  • Advance notice of new webinars and eBooks
  • Access to make comments and ask questions on BsB



What to read next

Happy Holidays…

The Bitesize Bio team will be taking a well-earned rest over the holidays and we would like to wish our readers a very merry Christmas. Myself, Dan, Suzanne and Terry have really enjoyed bringing you the best of molecular and cell biology tips, journal articles, news, comment and other stuff over the last four months [...]

I’m Not That Kind of Doctor: A Guide for Enjoying the Holidays

As a graduate student or a card-carrying PhD, you may have discovered that you unwittingly (and probably inappropriately) have become the authority in your family on all things scientific and health related. For this reason, the upcoming holiday season might harbor some additional family-related stress for you. Before you shout “I’m not that kind of [...]

Brahe’s Battle: Kickstarting Science With Rap

“Science” and “rap” are not the two words I expected to find in one sentence. How very small-minded of me. Much to my surprise I discovered that in 2010 Bitesize Bio had a BioPop Rap Battle between nationally-recognized Tom McFadden and a relative newcomer, Science Rapper. In this epic battle between the Cassius Clay and [...]

Molecular Cooking: How to Apply Science in the Kitchen

Rumour has it that many people who work in a lab enjoy cooking. And, when asked by a non-biologist family member how they spend their days in the laboratory, molecular biologists might answer that doing experiments is similar to cooking. Apart from the organisational parallels that can be drawn between following a protocol and a [...]

About the author

What do you think?

6 comments

  1. from Oh, I'm not a scientist? on

    …but have been re-classified in the newly created Family Academiae.

    Ummm, excuse me?

  2. from on

    Some would argue that (us) industrial scientists are a different species altogether, but you are right – there is definitely a case for re-naming the family.

  3. from Terry on

    I would argue that to be any sort of scientist, you must have at least passed through the academic world…but like I said, the system is still in its early days and may require revision!

  4. from Lil on

    I think I am Scienticus renaissancus… (I looooooove to eat!) ;)

  5. from tsa on

    The most common species these days was forgotten: Scienticus bullshitica. These individuals would do equally well as used car salesmen or Realtors. They have somehow found themselves in the wrong field, but because of their sharp skills in marketing and fast, smooth talking, they more than make up for their lack of critical thinking scientific reasoning skills and have become the dominant species in both academia and non-profit research institutions, where sadly, the trend has been that big bucks are more important than truth. They feed at fancy restaurants with a variety of other Scienticus spp.

  6. from on

    Scienticus bullshitica – I know a couple of those.

    @Terry – I like your reasoning there…

Subscribe to Channels

To receive information about any of our new channels click on the button below.
subscribe to the channel newsletter »

Write for us

Have a short tip, a written
article or a video you'd like
to see published?
write for us »