Don’t Overdo The Multi-tasking



Multi-tasking used to be my favourite way to get ahead.

During my PhD I saw others around me working extremely long hours in the lab and not really having much of a personal life and quite early on I made the decision that this was not for me.

Although I enjoy my work, having a good life outside the is also very important. Also, I found that if I worked very long hours then I tended to be far less efficient overall.

But, I still wanted to get through as many experiments as possible. So I also made the decision that my approach would be to work a regular 8 hour day and be as efficient as possible during that time. My basic recipe for an efficient working day was:

1. Good time planning

2. Multi-tasking

3. Efficient and accurate record keeping

4. Short breaks (!)

Most of this worked quite well, but in retrospect the multi-tasking part was not a good idea, at least to the extent I took it to.

My aim in multi-tasking was to fill every part of the working day with something useful. So I would normally have several experiments going on at once and flit between them in a packed schedule. Gaps in the schedule were filled with the other necessaries: writing up, reading, making solutions.

I definitely got through a lot of experiments that way. But that was the only good thing that such a packed schedule delivered.

Multi-tasking with few gaps in the day made me stressed, error-prone and took the enjoyment out of the job. That’s not surprising looking at it now, but at the time I thought it was the best way to work.

A quick Google search on multi-tasking brings up a whole host of articles highlighting the inefficiency of multi-tasking (see here and here for example - both contain links to other useful articles including primary literature). Apparently the brain takes a certain amount of time to switch between tasks, so constant switching means constantly losing time and train-of-thought.

These days I still multi-task - although your brain is not designed for it, there’s no way around it. But I pay close attention to the number of tasks I am juggling. Where possible I perform only one or two experiments in parallel, and guess what? I have a much higher rate of success, and much less stress than before.

What do you think of multi-tasking?


Like this? Click here for RSS/e-mail updates about new articles

1 Comment so far

  1. Around The Blogs | Bitesize Bio on July 11th, 2008

    [...] Superficial science. This great article at Adaptive complexity suggests that the fragmenting your working day by doing many things at once is a poor approach to science. We agree. [...]

Leave a reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word