Personal Genomes and Modern Eugenics

About the author

Dan Rhoads

Dan is a postdoc working at the University of Cyprus in developmental biology. He has a BSc in molecular biology and a PhD pharmacology and biochemistry.

To enable tagging you will need to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio

As genetic screening becomes increasingly advanced and personal genomes become more commonplace, the potential for genetic engineering and modern eugenics is becoming a reality. “Designer babies” may not be science fiction forever, creating an ethical dilemna on the horizon.

Hsein-Hsein keeps us informed on personalized sequencing companies that are coming out, including 23andMe, deCODEme, and Navigenics, and now the first whole genome squencing company, Knome. The goal for some is to one day sequence genomes for $1000, putting it within the reach of average consumers.

What are the benefits to personal genomics?

Certainly, no one has an objection to programs like Dor Yeshorim, which is a program which seeks to reduce the incidence of Tay-Sachs disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Canavan disease, Fanconi anemia, Familial Dysautonomia, Glycogen storage disease, Bloom’s Syndrome, Gaucher Disease, Niemann-Pick Disease, and Mucolipidosis IV among certain Jewish communities.

Genetic engineering of humans to better survive space travel may also be an ethical possibility, if it’s needed. For instance, could we make ourselves better suited to endure weightlessness and cosmic irradiation during interstellar transit?

Those are the prime benefits. What about the caveats though?

Could personal genetic information be used against individuals? There’s the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act (GINA) to protect us there.

Could individuals themselves abuse personal genetic information? The technology for creating designer babies remains a long way off, at the very least. But what if we could? Would we be tempted to shape our children to our ideals?

What will people do with this brave new genetic determinism? Hopefully not start to ascribe all of their hopes and woes to their genes; referring to ourselves as merely the sum total of our genes is a gross oversimplification.

Right now though, personalized genetics is at the forefront of innovation against inheritable diseases. The Knome launch is exciting, and even a little surreal, to those of us who remember just 15 years ago, when the sequencing of one genome was thought to be a far-off dream of fiction.



2 comments on this article already!

  1. Eric

    2 years ago

    Great topic.

    Here is a working link to the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act: http://www.genome.gov/24519851

  2. Steven Murphy MD

    2 years ago

    An old professor of mine once said.
    “There is no genetic disadvantage which cannot be overcome. More importantly, the is no genetic advantage which cannot be squandered by man”

    Great post
    -Steve
    http://www.thegenesherpa.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you now have to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio

Register Now on Bitesize Bio

  • get access to our live online seminars
  • get members-only free downloads (coming soon)
  • ask and answer questions in our community
  • keep track of your favorite articles in myBsB
  • be part of the coolest bioscience site on the web
Register Log In