Quick reference: Determining DNA Concentration & Purity |
The most comprehensive way to evaluate DNA concentration and purity is to use both UV spectrophotometeric measurements and agarose gel eletrophoresis. This quick reference guide gives an overview of the information that can be derived from both.
UV spectrophotometric measurement of DNA concentration and purity
DNA itself, and most of the common contaminants found in DNA preps, have absorbances in the region 230nm to 320nm so measurement of the absorbances in this region allows measurement of the DNA concentration and provides information about the contaminant levels. The measurements can be performed on a conventional spectrophotometer, or on one made specifically for biomolecule analysis, such as Eppendorf’s Biophotometer. However the measurement is perfomed, the most important wavelengths to note are:
A good quality DNA sample should have a A260/A280 ratio of 1.7-2.0 and an A260/A230 ratio of greater than 1.5, but since the sensitivity of different techniques to these contaminants varies, these values should only be taken as a guide to the purity of your sample. For an accurate measurement, the A260 value must lie between 0.1 and 1, so dilution of concentrated samples may be required.
Measurement of DNA concentration and purity using agarose gel electrophoresis
A drawback to spectrophotometric measurements is that contaminants such as genomic DNA (a contaminant in plasmid preps), RNA, guanidium and proteins all display some absorbance at 260nm, so if they are present at high levels in the DNA prep they will contribute to an increased A260 reading and lead to an overestimation of the DNA concentration. Agarose gel electrophoresis, using a quantitative dye such as ethidium bromide, can be used an an alternative approach to measure sample DNA concentration with is not affected by these contaminants. The DNA concentration of a sample can be roughly calculated by comparison of the sample band intensity with that of a molecular weight marker band whose DNA content is known.
Contaminating RNA or genomic DNA can be detected on an agarose gel, since RNA will run as a low molecular weight smear and genomic DNA as a high molecular band. In addition, an important indication of the quality of plasmid DNA prepared by alkaline lysis (e.g. mini/midi preps) can be obtained since permanent denaturation of the DNA caused by over-incubation in lysis buffer is indicated by a slower than expected migration on an agarose gel.
To leave a reply you now have to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio
el
Great…!
it’s quite helpful for us who’s been studying molecular biology…
Kurt
What is the average base pair molecular mass? Some times it might be useful to calculate the molar concentration of DNA, to get the correct proportion between a small fragment and a vector for ligation.
Kurt
It turns out that promega got a nice conversion table:
http://www.promega.com/techserv/techref/na_protein.htm
Nick
Thanks for that Kurt. For reference, the average mass for dsDNA=649 Da/bp
RIZWAN AHMED
i like this website,its very informative
Pingback: The Best of: Tech Tips | The Molecular Biology Blog
Noufa
nice, good,simple and clear information
ryan
it’s tryptophan that absorbs most strongly at 280 nm, not tyrosine.
Nick
Thanks Ryan. It should be tyrosine AND tryptophan. I have updated the article.
Evan
thank you Nick
Sheri
getting a strong absorbance at 245 nm from DNA purified with the Fermentas gel extraction kit- is this due to agarose contamination?
ashitha
thanks , the informations are up to the point and easy to grasp
Raghav
Hi.. What about the free nucleotides in the sample…do they also have absorbance max at 260nm or at 230 nm?
Gulzar
As you mentioned that readings @260nm should lie between 0.1 and 1 which is necessary as i know that but nanodrop is giving us directly concentration instead of readings, so should we trust on it or not. Actually i sometimes found some difference in concentration between nanodrop calculation and agarose gel analysis.
Migue
thank you for the post which is very interesting. I am experiencing an issue with my plasmids. I am using the traditional method described in the Maniatis manual (Molecular Cloning) to do the maxiprep (alkaline lysis), and I use the polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) process to purify the plasmid DNA. After that I use RNAse to get rid off the reminder RNA and phenol, phenol-chloroform and precipitation.
Then I adjust the concentration of my plasmids to be 1 mg/ml (using nanodrop). [Parenthesis: as Gulzar says the measure with nanodrop can be tricky since I have watched that the machine can give OD260 of 22 or 30, that is definitively higher than 1, and also high OD280, then keeping a ratio 260/280 in the good range.]
If I measure concentration, OD 260/280 is fine with what is suppose to be good plasmid preparation. But when I am comparing different plasmids batches (even with the same kind of plasmid) in an agarose gel, placing 1 ug of DNA per sample, I am watching that some plasmid batches differ from others in brightness intensity of the bands, even 2, 3 or 4 times.
Curiously, if I perform a real time quantitative PCR of these different batches of the same plasmid, making different dilutions (using as reference value the one given by nanodrop), the amplification curves match perfectly.
Therefore, what it is in the gel????? Can the EtBr bind something else than DNA? what can run in a gel at the same level than plasmid and not being plasmid??? Is it not the nicked plasmid amplified in a real time qPCR???
Thank you!!