Quick reference: Determining DNA Concentration & Purity

About the author

Nick Oswald

Nick is a molecular biologist-turned-publisher. After a PhD in Developmental Biology and an eclectic seven years in biotech he is now Editorial Manager of Neuroendocrinology and the founder and Editor-In-Chief of Bitesize Bio. You are welcome to connect with Nick on LinkedIn

To enable tagging you will need to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio

The most comprehensive way to evaluate DNA concentration and purity is to use both UV spectrophotometeric measurements and agarose gel eletrophoresis. This quick reference guide gives an overview of the information that can be derived from both.

UV spectrophotometric measurement of DNA concentration and purity

DNA itself, and most of the common contaminants found in DNA preps, have absorbances in the region 230nm to 320nm so measurement of the absorbances in this region allows measurement of the DNA concentration and provides information about the contaminant levels. The measurements can be performed on a conventional spectrophotometer, or on one made specifically for biomolecule analysis, such as Eppendorf’s Biophotometer. However the measurement is perfomed, the most important wavelengths to note are:

  • 230nm: Guanidium salts (used to facilitate DNA binding to silica columns) and phenol (used in phenol/chloroform extractions) absorb strongly at 230nm, therefore high absorbances at this wavelength can be indicative of carry-over of either of these compounds into the sample.
  • 260nm: DNA absorbs light most strongly at 260nm so the absorbance value at this wavelength (called A260) can be used to estimate the DNA concentration using the equation Concentration (µg/ml) = (A260 reading – A320 reading) x 50 , which is derived from Beer’s Law .
  • 280nm: Since tyrosine and tryptophan residues absorb strongly at this wavelength, the absorbance at 280nm is used as an indicator of protein contamination.
  • 320nm: A320 provides a general measurement of the turbidity of the sample and is normally subtracted from the A260 value as a background reading for the calculation of DNA concentration, but excessive values may indicate non-specific contamination.

A good quality DNA sample should have a A260/A280 ratio of 1.7-2.0 and an A260/A230 ratio of greater than 1.5, but since the sensitivity of different techniques to these contaminants varies, these values should only be taken as a guide to the purity of your sample. For an accurate measurement, the A260 value must lie between 0.1 and 1, so dilution of concentrated samples may be required.

Measurement of DNA concentration and purity using agarose gel electrophoresis

A drawback to spectrophotometric measurements is that contaminants such as genomic DNA (a contaminant in plasmid preps), RNA, guanidium and proteins all display some absorbance at 260nm, so if they are present at high levels in the DNA prep they will contribute to an increased A260 reading and lead to an overestimation of the DNA concentration. Agarose gel electrophoresis, using a quantitative dye such as ethidium bromide, can be used an an alternative approach to measure sample DNA concentration with is not affected by these contaminants. The DNA concentration of a sample can be roughly calculated by comparison of the sample band intensity with that of a molecular weight marker band whose DNA content is known.

Contaminating RNA or genomic DNA can be detected on an agarose gel, since RNA will run as a low molecular weight smear and genomic DNA as a high molecular band. In addition, an important indication of the quality of plasmid DNA prepared by alkaline lysis (e.g. mini/midi preps) can be obtained since permanent denaturation of the DNA caused by over-incubation in lysis buffer is indicated by a slower than expected migration on an agarose gel.



15 comments on this article already!

  1. el

    2 years ago

    Great…!
    it’s quite helpful for us who’s been studying molecular biology…

  2. Kurt

    2 years ago

    What is the average base pair molecular mass? Some times it might be useful to calculate the molar concentration of DNA, to get the correct proportion between a small fragment and a vector for ligation.

  3. Kurt

    2 years ago

    It turns out that promega got a nice conversion table:

    http://www.promega.com/techserv/techref/na_protein.htm

  4. Nick

    2 years ago

    Thanks for that Kurt. For reference, the average mass for dsDNA=649 Da/bp

  5. RIZWAN AHMED

    2 years ago

    i like this website,its very informative

  6. Noufa

    2 years ago

    nice, good,simple and clear information

  7. ryan

    1 year ago

    it’s tryptophan that absorbs most strongly at 280 nm, not tyrosine.

  8. Nick

    1 year ago

    Thanks Ryan. It should be tyrosine AND tryptophan. I have updated the article.

  9. Evan

    1 year ago

    thank you Nick

  10. Sheri

    1 year ago

    getting a strong absorbance at 245 nm from DNA purified with the Fermentas gel extraction kit- is this due to agarose contamination?

  11. ashitha

    1 year ago

    thanks , the informations are up to the point and easy to grasp

  12. Raghav

    10 months ago

    Hi.. What about the free nucleotides in the sample…do they also have absorbance max at 260nm or at 230 nm?

  13. Gulzar

    5 months ago

    As you mentioned that readings @260nm should lie between 0.1 and 1 which is necessary as i know that but nanodrop is giving us directly concentration instead of readings, so should we trust on it or not. Actually i sometimes found some difference in concentration between nanodrop calculation and agarose gel analysis.

  14. Migue

    28 days ago

    thank you for the post which is very interesting. I am experiencing an issue with my plasmids. I am using the traditional method described in the Maniatis manual (Molecular Cloning) to do the maxiprep (alkaline lysis), and I use the polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) process to purify the plasmid DNA. After that I use RNAse to get rid off the reminder RNA and phenol, phenol-chloroform and precipitation.
    Then I adjust the concentration of my plasmids to be 1 mg/ml (using nanodrop). [Parenthesis: as Gulzar says the measure with nanodrop can be tricky since I have watched that the machine can give OD260 of 22 or 30, that is definitively higher than 1, and also high OD280, then keeping a ratio 260/280 in the good range.]
    If I measure concentration, OD 260/280 is fine with what is suppose to be good plasmid preparation. But when I am comparing different plasmids batches (even with the same kind of plasmid) in an agarose gel, placing 1 ug of DNA per sample, I am watching that some plasmid batches differ from others in brightness intensity of the bands, even 2, 3 or 4 times.
    Curiously, if I perform a real time quantitative PCR of these different batches of the same plasmid, making different dilutions (using as reference value the one given by nanodrop), the amplification curves match perfectly.
    Therefore, what it is in the gel????? Can the EtBr bind something else than DNA? what can run in a gel at the same level than plasmid and not being plasmid??? Is it not the nicked plasmid amplified in a real time qPCR???

    Thank you!!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you now have to register on Bitesize Bio. We're sorry for the inconvenience, but it's free, only takes a few seconds, and it will enable you to view our seminars for free, ask questions from the professional community, and take part in the lively community of Bitesize Bio

Register Now on Bitesize Bio

  • get access to our live online seminars
  • get members-only free downloads (coming soon)
  • ask and answer questions in our community
  • keep track of your favorite articles in myBsB
  • be part of the coolest bioscience site on the web
Register Log In